Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.4152/pea.201705269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Behavior of Acid Orange 7 by Cyclic Voltammetry in Different Solvents

Abstract: In the present work, the electrochemical oxidation of acid orange 7 (AO7) on a glassy carbon (GC) electrode has been investigated by cyclic voltammetry in different solvents: aqueous solvent (H2O), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and acetone (ACE), using sulfuric acid as a supporting electrolyte. The analysis of AO7 oxidation voltammograms in different solvents showed that the more donor numbers, the easier it becomes the oxidation of AO7. The experimental parameters show that the oxidation peak current of AO7 was l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XPS binding energy for N, seen at ∼400 eV (Figure ), has often been attributed to an azo (−NN−) group, ,, as mentioned above. If these −NN– surface groups are indeed present, they can be electrochemically reduced to −NH 2 (Reactions and ) at <0.3 V (vs RHE) , and oxidized at >1 V vs RHE. However, an oxidation process is not observed in the CV results for either VC–PhF 5 or CIC-22–PhF 5 (Figure ). Instead, the fluorinated carbons show an anodic current at >0.9 V much lower than that of the as-received ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The XPS binding energy for N, seen at ∼400 eV (Figure ), has often been attributed to an azo (−NN−) group, ,, as mentioned above. If these −NN– surface groups are indeed present, they can be electrochemically reduced to −NH 2 (Reactions and ) at <0.3 V (vs RHE) , and oxidized at >1 V vs RHE. However, an oxidation process is not observed in the CV results for either VC–PhF 5 or CIC-22–PhF 5 (Figure ). Instead, the fluorinated carbons show an anodic current at >0.9 V much lower than that of the as-received ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%