1998
DOI: 10.1021/om9709998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical and Structural Characterization ofcis- andtrans-[Cp(CO)Ru(μ-As(C6H5)2)]2, Isomers That Undergo Two-Electron-Transfer Oxidations

Abstract: The structures and oxidations of the cis and trans isomers of the doubly bridged dinuclear species [Cp(CO)Ru(μ-AsPh2)]2 (Ph = C6H5) have been studied by X-ray crystallography, electrochemistry, and IR and NMR spectroscopies. Each complex oxidizes in a single two-electron voltammetric process, the E 1/2 values being −0.36 V for the cis isomer (1) and −0.30 V for the trans isomer (2) in CH2Cl2/0.1 M [NBu4][PF6] (referenced to ferrocene). These are apparently the first comparative redox potentials published for c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of 4 2+/0 in ref were conducted by oxidizing 4 °. However, the couple is represented here as a reduction to correlate its electron-transfer-induced metal−metal bond cleavage with that of 1 0/2- and 2 0/2- .…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of 4 2+/0 in ref were conducted by oxidizing 4 °. However, the couple is represented here as a reduction to correlate its electron-transfer-induced metal−metal bond cleavage with that of 1 0/2- and 2 0/2- .…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerted multielectron transfer reactions occur widely in chemistry and biology. Although seemingly paradoxical, the electrostatic restrictions on such processes are lifted when an accompanying structural or compositional change (proton transfer, ligand binding, or ion-pair formation) makes transfer of a second unit of charge more favorable than the first. Some years ago, we encountered a family of ligand-bridged binuclear complexes that undergo one-step, two-electron transfer by a mechanism wherein the stoichiometry of the redox center does not change. Experimental and computational studies have been conducted on many such systems, from which it is evident that metal−metal bond cleavage accompanied by structural reorganization provides the necessary driving force for a multielectron event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron-transfer reactions with first-row transition metals typically follow one-electron (1e – ) pathways. Therefore, many synthetic first-row metal complexes that have shown multielectron reactivity incorporate multiple metal centers, where each is oxidized/reduced by 1e – . For complexes that achieve multielectron redox chemistry at monometallic centers, however, structural changes around the metal center and/or noninnocent ligands have been utilized to force a multielectron pathway over single electron transfer. In these examples, the 1e – redox potentials associated with the metal center are shifted from their normal ordering to a condition known as potential inversion …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, based on the reduction potentials, bpy appears to be the most electron-donating ligand for the Cu(II) complexes of the type Cu(NN 0 ) 2 (OTf) 2 , we cannot ignore the difference in stereoisomers, which may also inuence the observed redox potentials. 37 Interestingly, the complex 2 with a saturated and electrondonating hexyl substituted NN 0 hex ligand resulted in only slightly more cathodic shi by À20 mV compared to that of 1, containing an aromatic phenyl substituent. This small potential difference suggests that the type of substituents at the triazole N4 position have little effect on the electron density at the copper center.…”
Section: Electronic Spectra and Electrochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%