2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes using novel electrode materials for mineralization and biodegradability enhancement of nanofiltration concentrate of landfill leachates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of active anode would avoid the fast mineralization and therefore may increase the amount of biodegradable intermediates, as recently assessed [25]. It is also important to consider possible formation of toxic by-products that might affect the biomass of the biological treatment, particularly inorganic species such as chlorate, perchlorate or ammonia [32][33][34]. Finally, it might be not suitable to use AO as a post-treatment following a biological treatment because of strong mass transport limitation and low faradaic efficiency due to the low concentration of organics.…”
Section: Anodic Oxidation Coupled With Biological Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of active anode would avoid the fast mineralization and therefore may increase the amount of biodegradable intermediates, as recently assessed [25]. It is also important to consider possible formation of toxic by-products that might affect the biomass of the biological treatment, particularly inorganic species such as chlorate, perchlorate or ammonia [32][33][34]. Finally, it might be not suitable to use AO as a post-treatment following a biological treatment because of strong mass transport limitation and low faradaic efficiency due to the low concentration of organics.…”
Section: Anodic Oxidation Coupled With Biological Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents a list of the physico-chemical analysis carried out in LLs, the methods of determinations used and the laboratory equipment used (all according to the APHA 2005 standard). One of the main challenges for AOPs is to reduce the energy consumption [36]. The energy consumption was expressed as W, kWh and was calculated in the following way: the applied current [A] was multiplied by electrolysis time [8 h] and the average cell voltage (E cell ) [V], then this value (W, kWh) was recalculated and expressed in kWh•m −3 .…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies indicate [21,26,35] that the degradation of ammonium in LLs is a second-order reaction (first-order with respect to the concentration of ammonium, and first-order with respect to the concentration of active chlorine), while COD degradation fits a pseudo-first model, or pseudo-zeroth-order kinetics models. The kinetic model of COD degradation is determined by the following factors: contaminant concentration level in the analyzed matrix, the applied current density (j), the electrode substrate, pH and temperature [26,36,37]. The degradation of contaminants in the LLs matrix is a very complex process that has not yet been fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, commonly detected OMPs such as ibuprofen showed biodegradable removal of 75% whereas Estrone (E1) and 17-α-Ethinyl estradiol (EE2) achieved 83% and 44% removal [41]. Furthermore, advanced OMP removal or destruction options include adsorption or ion exchange using activated carbon and ion exchange resins, ultraviolet (UV) disinfection and advanced oxidation processes (AOP) such as hydrogen peroxide oxidation, electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) such as Anodic oxidation (AO) and electro-Fenton (EF) [42] and photocatalytic degradation. However these processes involve high capital and energy costs and also require disposal of highly contaminated exhausted sorbent or problematic residues [33].…”
Section: Membrane Bioreactors In Organic Micropollutants Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%