1990
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90520-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocardiographic Q-wave inconstancy in inferior wall myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful reper fusion has been shown to accelerate the rate of ECG changes [2] whereas delay in Q-wave appearance has been attributed to sustained compromised perfusion of the infarcted area. Regression or inconstancy of Q-waves may be seen even as early as one week post-MI [3]. Naturally evolving non-Q-wave Ml would be expected in up to 37% of patients admitted with chest pain and ST segment elevation [4] as compared with 43% of patients who are treated with thrombolytic therapy [5], To our knowledge, no material has been published so far on the dynamic nature of Qwaves during thrombolytic therapy given at the early stages of AMI.…”
Section: Electrocardiographic Q-w Aves Inconstancy During Thrombolysimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful reper fusion has been shown to accelerate the rate of ECG changes [2] whereas delay in Q-wave appearance has been attributed to sustained compromised perfusion of the infarcted area. Regression or inconstancy of Q-waves may be seen even as early as one week post-MI [3]. Naturally evolving non-Q-wave Ml would be expected in up to 37% of patients admitted with chest pain and ST segment elevation [4] as compared with 43% of patients who are treated with thrombolytic therapy [5], To our knowledge, no material has been published so far on the dynamic nature of Qwaves during thrombolytic therapy given at the early stages of AMI.…”
Section: Electrocardiographic Q-w Aves Inconstancy During Thrombolysimentioning
confidence: 99%