Abstract:Background
The electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the setting of cardiac pacing is often challenging. The original Sgarbossa criteria proposed in 1996 were demonstrated to be valid for diagnosis of AMI in both ventricular paced rhythm and left bundle branch block. To improve accuracy, the modified Sgarbossa criteria (MSC) were proposed.
Case presentation
We presented a case of electrocardiographic diagnosis of AM… Show more
“…1,2 However, it is not easy to make a diagnosis in case of bundle branch block, pacemaker rhythm, underlying structural heart disease, or anatomically-dislocated heart. [1][2][3] Additionally, the localization of a culprit artery via looking at the ECG findings can be time-saving in case of unstable patients, but correlation of culprit artery and ECG findings cannot be perfect always, especially in the presence of underlying ECG changes. Thus, reporting this kind of "outof-standard" example may have potential benefit for the physicians in their clinical judgment.…”
Detecting the anatomic location of the lesion with the help of electrocardiography (ECG) is an important and time-saving
decision in cases of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, it can be difficult in some patients with
different coronary anatomies or underlying structural heart diseases. Here, we reported a 34-year-old male patient with
an underlying atrial septal defect (ASD) who presented with acute inferior myocardial infarction with right ventricle (RV)
involvement due to acute thrombotic left anterior descending artery occlusion.
“…1,2 However, it is not easy to make a diagnosis in case of bundle branch block, pacemaker rhythm, underlying structural heart disease, or anatomically-dislocated heart. [1][2][3] Additionally, the localization of a culprit artery via looking at the ECG findings can be time-saving in case of unstable patients, but correlation of culprit artery and ECG findings cannot be perfect always, especially in the presence of underlying ECG changes. Thus, reporting this kind of "outof-standard" example may have potential benefit for the physicians in their clinical judgment.…”
Detecting the anatomic location of the lesion with the help of electrocardiography (ECG) is an important and time-saving
decision in cases of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, it can be difficult in some patients with
different coronary anatomies or underlying structural heart diseases. Here, we reported a 34-year-old male patient with
an underlying atrial septal defect (ASD) who presented with acute inferior myocardial infarction with right ventricle (RV)
involvement due to acute thrombotic left anterior descending artery occlusion.
The electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with
pacemakers has always been a problem in clinical practice, causing delays in management and worse clinical outcomes. Although complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right ventricular pacing can produce electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, specific morphological changes often allow the diagnosis of AMI or an old infarction.
Case report A 76-year-old patient with history of permanent pacemaker implantation due to a 3rd-degree atrioventricular block was admitted for chest pain. Upon admission, he was hemodynamically stable but with ECG showing pacemaker rhythm with LBBB fulfilling 2 points of Sgarbossa criteria (discordant elevation of the ST segment > 5 mm in leads V2 to V3) and ST/S ratio < - 0.25 in leads V3-V4. Laboratories showed elevated troponins, integrating diagnosis of AMI, and moving on to urgent coronary angiography. A lesion on the anterior descending coronary artery was documented, and a drug-eluting stent was successfully implanted. The patient was discharged stable, asymptomatic, and with pharmacological management for secondary prevention. ECG identification of an AMI in patients with pacemakers is essential to initiate reperfusion therapy. Guideline recommendations are constantly changing, but an algorithm that uses hemodynamic instability and the modified Sgarbossa criteria (MSC) to decide these patients; management could be a high-sensitivity tool and allow physicians to make the best decisions without waiting for laboratory results. MSC, which are more sensitive than the original criteria, continue to be helpful in the diagnosis of AMI. Clinicians should carefully choose the appropriate MSC cut-off (ST/T Ratio -0.20 and -0.25) on a case-by-case basis.
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction, Electrocardiogram, Pacemaker, Left bundle branch block, Acute coronary syndrome
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.