The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02462-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in a pacemaker patient: a case report

Abstract: Background The electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the setting of cardiac pacing is often challenging. The original Sgarbossa criteria proposed in 1996 were demonstrated to be valid for diagnosis of AMI in both ventricular paced rhythm and left bundle branch block. To improve accuracy, the modified Sgarbossa criteria (MSC) were proposed. Case presentation We presented a case of electrocardiographic diagnosis of AM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 However, it is not easy to make a diagnosis in case of bundle branch block, pacemaker rhythm, underlying structural heart disease, or anatomically-dislocated heart. [1][2][3] Additionally, the localization of a culprit artery via looking at the ECG findings can be time-saving in case of unstable patients, but correlation of culprit artery and ECG findings cannot be perfect always, especially in the presence of underlying ECG changes. Thus, reporting this kind of "outof-standard" example may have potential benefit for the physicians in their clinical judgment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, it is not easy to make a diagnosis in case of bundle branch block, pacemaker rhythm, underlying structural heart disease, or anatomically-dislocated heart. [1][2][3] Additionally, the localization of a culprit artery via looking at the ECG findings can be time-saving in case of unstable patients, but correlation of culprit artery and ECG findings cannot be perfect always, especially in the presence of underlying ECG changes. Thus, reporting this kind of "outof-standard" example may have potential benefit for the physicians in their clinical judgment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%