1959
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(59)90226-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocardiographic changes in atrial septal defects: Ostium secundum defect versus ostium primum (endocardial cushion) defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of arrhythmias and complete RBBB was rather high in the present material as compared to findings in materials consisting of younger patients [1,22,24]. It is, however, in fairly good agreement with other reports [6,20,21,27,28,32,33] on adult patients, supporting the concept that the frequency of these abnormalities increases with age [7,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The frequency of arrhythmias and complete RBBB was rather high in the present material as compared to findings in materials consisting of younger patients [1,22,24]. It is, however, in fairly good agreement with other reports [6,20,21,27,28,32,33] on adult patients, supporting the concept that the frequency of these abnormalities increases with age [7,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Specifically, Pryor, Woodwark, and Blount (1959) and Burchell, DuShane, and Brandenburg (1960) found that most defects of the ostium primum type were associated with left axis deviation, while normal or rightward QRS forces in the frontal plane were the rule with secundum defects. Only rarely has such deviation been recorded with ostium secundum lesions (Harrison and Morrow, 1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. 18). The causes for this discrepancy are under standable in view of the emphasis placed on terminal slurrings; the use of high fidelity (oscilloscopic) recordings, and the advan tage of the spatial approach over the simple inspection of scalar leads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%