1983
DOI: 10.3109/02841868309135967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocardiographic Changes After Radiation Therapy for Carcinoma of the Breast Incidence and functional significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 16 , 23 The timing of imaging in one study was before, during, and after (ie, before each cycle, then 2, 4, 7, and 12–18 months after) chemotherapy, 16 while, in the other study, imaging was a one-time assessment in long-term follow-up to chemotherapy treatment (mean follow-up of 34 months). 23 Stress ECG was utilized in five studies: one demonstrated a benefit, 22 although the benefit in this study was attributed to stress SPECT, not ECG; two demonstrated possible benefit, 19 , 27 and two no benefit. 17 , 20 Stress ventriculography was used in one study and demonstrated a benefit, compared to testing performed at rest; 26 while stress cMRI was also used in one study and failed to show a benefit, relative to resting imaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 16 , 23 The timing of imaging in one study was before, during, and after (ie, before each cycle, then 2, 4, 7, and 12–18 months after) chemotherapy, 16 while, in the other study, imaging was a one-time assessment in long-term follow-up to chemotherapy treatment (mean follow-up of 34 months). 23 Stress ECG was utilized in five studies: one demonstrated a benefit, 22 although the benefit in this study was attributed to stress SPECT, not ECG; two demonstrated possible benefit, 19 , 27 and two no benefit. 17 , 20 Stress ventriculography was used in one study and demonstrated a benefit, compared to testing performed at rest; 26 while stress cMRI was also used in one study and failed to show a benefit, relative to resting imaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Overall, five studies 16 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 showed a benefit, five 18 , 19 , 24 , 27 , 28 showed possible benefit, and four 17 , 20 , 21 , 29 showed no benefit to utilizing cardiac stress tests in identifying evidence of cardiovascular disease in breast cancer survivors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These changes present greater magnitude in the precordial derivations. 36 changes to the carotid arteries and other vessels An increased risk of stroke secondary to carotid artery disease has been reported in patients with a history of cervical irradiation, especially when it occurs at an age group in which the atherosclerotic disease of the carotid artery would not be expected. 15,37 A study that used a duplex scan of the carotid arteries in patients between 18 and 37 years of age who received cervical RT due Hodgkin's lymphoma, all in remission and asymptomatic, with more than five years since the end of treatment compared with a control group of healthy and age-matched volunteers identified focal or generalized abnormalities of the intima-media layer (26% in the study group versus 3% in the control group), such as fatty streaks, irregularities and discontinuities in the layers, microcalcifications, graininess and initial plaques smaller than 2 mm of common carotids and proximal internal sections of the carotid artery.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12) D5 was also chosen because there is evidence that a small volume of heart exposed to large doses of radiation can result in significant cardiac complications. (11,13) The difference in fraction size is another factor that should be considered when comparing dose parameters between PBI and WBI. The treatment regimens used in the protocol are a daily dose of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy for 25 to 35 fractions for WBI, compared with a PBI external beam dose of 3.85 Gy per fraction for 10 fractions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%