2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroanatomic mapping in athletes: Why and when. An expert opinion paper from the Italian Society of Sports Cardiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Miller et al [ 38 ] suggested performing EPS for risk stratification in patients with multiple phenotypic risk factors, such as the evidence of a trigger (pleomorphic PVCs) and substrate (CMR-proven myocardial fibrosis) for SCD. If carried out, a standard PVS protocol should be used, including up to three extra-stimuli from two different sites (right ventricular apex and right ventricular outflow tract) down to effective refractory period (ERP) or 200 ms [ 5 ]; the use of isoproterenol to increase the diagnostic yield of the test is currently not supported by the available literature [ 93 ]. The induction of polymorphic VT and VF with aggressive stimulation protocols (with three extra-stimuli) is a nonspecific finding and may not predict the future risk of SCD [ 38 ].…”
Section: Phenotypic Characterization and Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Miller et al [ 38 ] suggested performing EPS for risk stratification in patients with multiple phenotypic risk factors, such as the evidence of a trigger (pleomorphic PVCs) and substrate (CMR-proven myocardial fibrosis) for SCD. If carried out, a standard PVS protocol should be used, including up to three extra-stimuli from two different sites (right ventricular apex and right ventricular outflow tract) down to effective refractory period (ERP) or 200 ms [ 5 ]; the use of isoproterenol to increase the diagnostic yield of the test is currently not supported by the available literature [ 93 ]. The induction of polymorphic VT and VF with aggressive stimulation protocols (with three extra-stimuli) is a nonspecific finding and may not predict the future risk of SCD [ 38 ].…”
Section: Phenotypic Characterization and Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with a “positive” EPS (sustained monomorphic VT induction), Miller et al recommended implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ 38 ]. However, in the case of a negative PVS, the negative predictive value is at present uncertain, and the whole clinical picture should be considered for therapeutic decisions and advice concerning sports participation [ 61 , 62 , 93 ].…”
Section: Phenotypic Characterization and Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%