Surfactants are the major components of highly toxic substances affecting the ecological state of the hydrosphere; concentrations of surfactants are regulated by MPCs. The ability of surfactants to adsorb on surfaces determines their biological activity, which consists in disturbing the function of biological membranes.The control over the concentration of these toxicants in the presence of organic and inorganic substances is complicated by both the variety of surfactant types and wide ranges of their concentrations, namely, from traces in domestic sewage water to tens of per cent in industrial waste water.At present, chromatographic and extraction-spectrophotometric methods are mainly used for determining surfactants. These methods involve the stage of preliminary separation, which makes the analysis longer and demands for toxic solvents [1][2][3][4][5].Selective electrodes with liquid filling [6-8] were proposed for determining surfactants, but in virtue of their construction features, they were inapplicable to the determination of surfactants without preliminary sampling. The replacement of ISE internal solutions with a solid contact between the current lead and the membrane afforded some advantages to solid-contact electrodes (SCEs): they are convenient in service and can be used in any spatial orientation for monitoring technological processes and environmental samples. Some publications were devoted to the application of solid-contact electrodes of the coated-wire type to the potentiometric titration of surfactants [9][10][11]. The main drawbacks of these electrodes are their instability and poor reproducibility of potentials in time.The choice of electronic conductors and the elucidation of the factors responsible for the stability of the electrochemical and operational characteristics of such sensors are important for designing solid-contact, membrane, surfactant-selective electrodes.In this work, some regularities of interface formation in solid-contact potentiometric surfactant-selective sensors with the given electroanalytical and operational characteristics are considered.
EXPERIMENTALThe formulae and percentages of the major substances of the surfactant samples under study (anionic (ASs), cationic (CSs), and nonionic (NSs) surfactants) are summarized in Table 1.Solutions of surfactants (1 × 10 -2 -5 × 10 -4 M) were prepared by dissolving their weighed portions in water under slight heating; solutions with concentrations of 1 × 10 -3 to 1 × 10 -6 M were prepared by successive dilution. A 0.01 M solution of sodium tetraphenylborate (Chemapol Co.) with the concentration of the major substance 98.5% was used throughout.Ion pairs of dodecylsulfate and alkylpyridinium cations ( n = 10-18), those of cetylpyridinium with alkylsulfates ( n = 10-16) and tetraphenylborate, as well as compounds of nonylphenol (NP-10, NP-12) or alcohol (Sintanol DS-10) polyethoxylates with ions of barium(II) and tetraphenylborate (NS-Ba-TPB) were used as ionophores. The synthesis of active components of membranes, the preparation...