2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4772482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroacoustic response of 1-3 piezocomposite transducers for high power applications

Abstract: The electroacoustic performance of 1-3 piezoelectric composite transducers with low loss polymer filler was studied and compared to monolithic Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3 (PZT) piezoelectric transducers. The 1-3 composite transducers exhibited significantly high electromechanical coupling factor (k t $ 0.64) when compared to monolithic counterparts (k t $ 0.5), leading to the improved bandwidth and loop sensitivity, being on the order of 67% and À24.0 dB versus 44% and À24.8 dB, respectively. In addition, the acoustic output… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the parameters e 33 d 33 and g 33 d 33 are 4724.6 pC/mV and 24.8 pm 2 /N, respectively. Compared with the FOM of 1-3 composites previously reported, ,,, the FOM in this work is higher (Figure f). It shows that the transducer equipped with the PSC has high a performance transceiver and higher competitiveness among the existing transducers.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the parameters e 33 d 33 and g 33 d 33 are 4724.6 pC/mV and 24.8 pm 2 /N, respectively. Compared with the FOM of 1-3 composites previously reported, ,,, the FOM in this work is higher (Figure f). It shows that the transducer equipped with the PSC has high a performance transceiver and higher competitiveness among the existing transducers.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The d 33 values and average value of 60 random points are obtained (Figure d), where the average value is 489.4 pC/N. Compared with the previously reported rigid composites, ,,,, the d 33 in this work is higher, indicating that the PSC has better piezoelectric properties (Figure e). The underwater acoustic transducers based on the PSC show higher transmitting and receiving response.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These composites can overcome the shortcomings of single-phase piezoelectric materials, such as brittleness, high acoustic impedance, and at the same time possess the advantages of both the piezoceramics and the polymers, including low acoustic impedance, high electromechanical coupling coefficient, low mechanical loss and large dielectric constant [ 8 , 9 ]. Through designing and optimizing various connectivity patterns, such as 1-3 type [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], 2-2 type [ 3 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], these transducers can be used in high-frequency, high-power, and high-temperature applications [ 9 ]. In addition, an addition of modified epoxy, i.e., aluminum load epoxy, can also enhance their dielectric, piezoelectric and acoustic dampening [ 22 , 23 , 24 ], which is very useful for structural health monitoring, energy harvesting, and acoustic liners [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%