2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electro-Oxidation Reaction of Methanol over La2–xSrxNiO4+δ Ruddlesden–Popper Oxides

Abstract: How materials’ crystalline structure influences the underlying electronic configuration, along with redox properties, and plays a pivotal role in electrocatalysis is an intriguing question. Here, solution combustion-synthesized La2–x Sr x NiO4+δ (x = 0–0.8) Ruddlesden–Popper (RP) oxides were explored for an electrocatalytic methanol oxidation reaction. Optimal doping of bivalent Sr2+ in the A site enabled the tetragonal distortion and oxidation of Ni2+ to Ni3+ that resulted ultimately in enhanced covalent hybr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was interesting to find out that there was a subtle increase in specific surface area with co-doping. The pore-size diameter estimated by the Barret–Joyner–Halenda model confirmed the presence of mesopores with an average pore diameter of ∼3 nm. , The activity of MOR can be greatly influenced by the ECSA. ,, The ECSA was calculated from the plot in Figure e obtained from chronoamperometric studies using the following Cottrell equation: Q = 2 nFAD 1/2 C o t 1/2 π –1/2 , where Q = charge in coulomb, F = Faraday constant, n = number of electrons being transferred, A = area of electrode in cm 2 , D = diffusion coefficient of [K 3 Fe­(CN) 6 ] (7.6 × 10 –6 cm 2 s –1 ), t = time (s), and C o = concentration of K 3 Fe­(CN) 6 in mol cm –3 . The pristine CeO 2 exhibited an ECSA of 0.82 cm 2 , while Ce 0.95 Ni 0.05 O 2−δ also showed a similar value of 0.83 cm 2 .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was interesting to find out that there was a subtle increase in specific surface area with co-doping. The pore-size diameter estimated by the Barret–Joyner–Halenda model confirmed the presence of mesopores with an average pore diameter of ∼3 nm. , The activity of MOR can be greatly influenced by the ECSA. ,, The ECSA was calculated from the plot in Figure e obtained from chronoamperometric studies using the following Cottrell equation: Q = 2 nFAD 1/2 C o t 1/2 π –1/2 , where Q = charge in coulomb, F = Faraday constant, n = number of electrons being transferred, A = area of electrode in cm 2 , D = diffusion coefficient of [K 3 Fe­(CN) 6 ] (7.6 × 10 –6 cm 2 s –1 ), t = time (s), and C o = concentration of K 3 Fe­(CN) 6 in mol cm –3 . The pristine CeO 2 exhibited an ECSA of 0.82 cm 2 , while Ce 0.95 Ni 0.05 O 2−δ also showed a similar value of 0.83 cm 2 .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, the broadly distributed peak corresponding to O V in Ce 0.9 Ni 0.05 Sr 0.05 O 2−δ could be due to the presence of surface oxygen vacancies in the vicinity of Ce 3+ . , Post MOR, the O 1s spectra of the exhausted catalysts CeO 2 Ce 0.95 Ni 0.05 O 2−δ and Ce 0.9 Ni 0.05 Sr 0.05 O 2−δ are plotted in Figure b. Apparently, the deconvoluted O 1s spectra of Ce 0.95 Ni 0.05 O 2−δ and Ce 0.9 Ni 0.05 Sr 0.05 O 2−δ exhibited an extra peak at 533.2 eV corresponding to the surface-bound intermediate −OOH species formed during methanol oxidation in addition to the usual O L , O V , and O W peaks. , While the relative intensity of the peak corresponding to −OOH was highest in Ce 0.9 Ni 0.05 Sr 0.05 O 2−δ , it was not at all observed in the case of pure CeO 2 . A shift of −OOH to higher binding energy from Ce 0.95 Ni 0.05 O 2−δ to Ce 0.9 Ni 0.05 Sr 0.05 O 2−δ was also observed.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smaller crystalline size, higher specific surface area and higher oxygen-ion vacancy concentration of Co 3 O 4 from solution combustion synthesis might be responsible for the higher ECSA value. 48…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage of methanol as a fuel potentially overcomes many problems in H 2 –polymer electrolyte membrane fuel-cell technology; however, low efficiency and activity in direct methanol fuel cells remain as key bottlenecks. This is explicitly referred to two issues: (1) the generation of stable and poisonous CO (for electrode) and (2) a higher anode overpotential as compared to the H 2 –polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. , Their combined effect drastically hampers the overall fuel-cell efficiency, although the equilibrium potential of anode reaction is nearly same as that of the H 2 –polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Many reports suggest that Pt displays higher catalytic activity for methanol oxidation reaction (MOR); nevertheless, high cost and CO poisoning limit their widespread applications. , Recently, the research in development of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for MOR has been extensively carried out. Particularly, non-noble-metal composites like hydroxides, oxides, carbides, nitrides, phosphides, and chalcogenides were also reported for electrocatalytic applications, thus making non-noble-metal transition compounds a budding choice for MOR activity. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%