2017
DOI: 10.1177/1464993416688824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electricity Liberalisation in Developing Countries

Abstract: Liberalisation of the electricity sector by unbundling the networks from generation and creating power markets has been promoted to developing countries by the World Bank and others for nearly two decades, in order to stimulate private sector investment. The paper presents cross-country comparisons of progress with liberalisation in the largest developing economies along with investment indicators of generating capacity and access to electricity networks, showing extensive growth in investment regardless of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In developing countries, large technical and non-technical losses in transmission lines, supply interruptions or blackouts, crosssubsidy policies, the establishment of below-cost tariffs, high levels of indebtedness of the incumbent company, and lack of investment in the power sector were observed [18,19]. In addition to the problems of an inefficient monopoly, other factors influenced the restructuring of the sector, such as the reform process in telecommunications, air transport, and railroads sectors, and the pressure from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund [20]. Technological factors, such as the development of the small-capacity gas turbine and the development of telecommunications technologies, were important in the reform process of the electricity sector [15].…”
Section: Why Restructure?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing countries, large technical and non-technical losses in transmission lines, supply interruptions or blackouts, crosssubsidy policies, the establishment of below-cost tariffs, high levels of indebtedness of the incumbent company, and lack of investment in the power sector were observed [18,19]. In addition to the problems of an inefficient monopoly, other factors influenced the restructuring of the sector, such as the reform process in telecommunications, air transport, and railroads sectors, and the pressure from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund [20]. Technological factors, such as the development of the small-capacity gas turbine and the development of telecommunications technologies, were important in the reform process of the electricity sector [15].…”
Section: Why Restructure?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The year 1988 saw the beginning of independent power producers (IPPs) in response to an executive order from the then President, driven by the need to address the looming electricity shortages in the island [14]. By 1994, more than 40 IPP contracts were accumulated, a number that is more than any other developing countries [15]. Table 1 shows the current generation market share in the Philippines.…”
Section: Esi Liberalisation In the Philippinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, countries with small electricity systems, such as many small African countries, lacked the necessary degree of competition. As a consequence, liberalisation interventions and private sector involvement like IPPs partly led to low-competition oligopolistic market structures (Nepal and Jamasb 2012;Hall and Nguyen 2017;McCulloch, Ward, and Sindou 2017). Reforms additionally proved much harder to be adopted than originally believed because they failed to take account of the underlying political constraints facing decision makers (McCulloch, Ward, and Sindou 2017; Lee and Usman 2018).…”
Section: Synthesis Of Qualitative Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the large majority of developing countries adopted such reforms, although selectively and by far not to the degree observed in the industrialized world. Reforms often stagnated at an intermediate stage or were partly even reversed (Hall and Nguyen 2017;Foster et al 2017;Urpelainen and Yang 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%