2000
DOI: 10.1892/0891-6640(2000)014<0418:eibraf>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrically Induced Blink Reflex and Facial Motor Nerve Stimulation in Beagles

Abstract: Electrophysiologic assessment of the blink reflex test and the muscle-evoked potentials evoked by stimulation of the facial nerve were performed in 15 healthy adult Beagles before and after supraorbital (trigeminal) and facial anesthetic nerve blocks performed by lidocaine injections. Unilateral electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve elicited 2 ipsilateral (R1 and R2) and a contralateral (Rc) reflex muscle potential in orbicularis oculi muscles. Electrical stimulation of the facial nerve elicited 2 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For recording of the blink reflex and facial motor nerve stimulation procedures, dogs were sedated with meperidine (5 mg/kg SC or IM), and recordings made in sternal recumbency using previously described techniques. 7 The 2nd late ipsilateral (R3) response was not consistently evoked in test dogs, and therefore this variable was not included in statistical analyses. Onset latencies were measured from the stimulus artifact to the initial deflection of the reflexinduced muscle potential.…”
Section: Electrodiagnostic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For recording of the blink reflex and facial motor nerve stimulation procedures, dogs were sedated with meperidine (5 mg/kg SC or IM), and recordings made in sternal recumbency using previously described techniques. 7 The 2nd late ipsilateral (R3) response was not consistently evoked in test dogs, and therefore this variable was not included in statistical analyses. Onset latencies were measured from the stimulus artifact to the initial deflection of the reflexinduced muscle potential.…”
Section: Electrodiagnostic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these patients, the palpebral reflex may even be hyperactive characterised by a spasm or repetitively blinking of the eyelids (Ö ge and others 2005). Other criteria to differentiate UMN from LMN dysfunction are the presence of other signs of cerebral dysfunction and electrophysiological assessment of the facial nerve (Añor andothers 2000, Lorenz andKornegay 2004). In the second case of this report, a lesion, seemingly arising from the cranial middle fossa and extending 3 cm rostrally, was noticed with no involvement of the facial nucleus or facial nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%