1975
DOI: 10.1049/piee.1975.0262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical standards of measurement. Part 1: D.C. and low-frequency standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 5, on simplification, is and neglecting n* in the above, the error in the closedloop frequency response from 0-70 Hz, under dynamic conditions, reduces to Therefore With £ c = 0.535 and n e = 0.047, Y, n =0.09% «0.1% (16) Thus, the overall accuracy of the standard accelerometer, with an indicator of 0.01% accuracy is of the order of 0.1% under static as well as dynamic conditions.…”
Section: Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 and 5, on simplification, is and neglecting n* in the above, the error in the closedloop frequency response from 0-70 Hz, under dynamic conditions, reduces to Therefore With £ c = 0.535 and n e = 0.047, Y, n =0.09% «0.1% (16) Thus, the overall accuracy of the standard accelerometer, with an indicator of 0.01% accuracy is of the order of 0.1% under static as well as dynamic conditions.…”
Section: Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, Dix and Bailey [16] have concluded: 'At present most accurate technique for the measurement of alternating voltage is to establish a direct voltage of the same value, by means of AC/DC transfer over a wide range of voltage and frequency'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful evaluations of TVC's from 1 to 1000 V and TCCs from 1 mA to 1 A or more have been made in national laboratories to about 10 ppm at audio frequencies, with reduced accuracies at higher frequencies [8], [32], [33], [34]. Comparisons with electrostatic and crest-responding instruments in these laboratories have provided valuable confirmation of the absence of large errors.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ac-dc Comparatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%