2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42391-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical Response of Ionic Conductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 388 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ngai et al , and Li. et al proposed that the observed non-Arrhenius dependence of the conductivity was due to the glassy nature for 8YSZ using Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann law . The barrier reduction from low to high temperature has been tentatively explained by many groups ,,,, as the consequence of, for example, the likely Y–O v pairing below 900 K that constrains the motion of O v , and the effect of the grain boundary on conductivity at low temperatures. , These, however, were not evidenced directly by simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ngai et al , and Li. et al proposed that the observed non-Arrhenius dependence of the conductivity was due to the glassy nature for 8YSZ using Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann law . The barrier reduction from low to high temperature has been tentatively explained by many groups ,,,, as the consequence of, for example, the likely Y–O v pairing below 900 K that constrains the motion of O v , and the effect of the grain boundary on conductivity at low temperatures. , These, however, were not evidenced directly by simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%