2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical resistivity in support of geological mapping along the Panama Canal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher resistivity zones are thought to represent unsaturated zones of unconsolidated sediments. As previously mentioned, although rapid changes in resistivity may suggest the presence of fault at the near surface, it is insufficient to make a reasonable judgement because anomalous zones may be caused by factor such as changes in geohydrologic conditions, lithology, or presence of channel cut and fill [37][38][39][40] . For VP1 and VP2 survey lines, resistivity values may be suspected to associate with terrain because low resistivity zones are found on both sides of the hill.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Higher resistivity zones are thought to represent unsaturated zones of unconsolidated sediments. As previously mentioned, although rapid changes in resistivity may suggest the presence of fault at the near surface, it is insufficient to make a reasonable judgement because anomalous zones may be caused by factor such as changes in geohydrologic conditions, lithology, or presence of channel cut and fill [37][38][39][40] . For VP1 and VP2 survey lines, resistivity values may be suspected to associate with terrain because low resistivity zones are found on both sides of the hill.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Loke et al (2013) gave a good review of the developments of a variety of resistivity surveys. Among these studies, a few researchers used waterborne resistivity surveys for geological mapping (Rinaldi et al, 2006;Rucker et al, 2011) and submarine groundwater discharge (Day-Lewis et al, 2006;Henderson et al, 2010;Swarzenski et al, 2007). In the current study, we conducted resistivity imaging surveys with the Lippmann 4-point Light system and passive electrodes.…”
Section: Survey Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The array configuration was made of 13 equispaced graphite electrodes at 5 m intervals. Rucker et al (2011) conducted a waterborne resistivity survey with floating dipole-dipole array along the entire length of the Panama Canal to characterize the types and volumes of sediments and rocks beneath the waterway.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%