2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-020-01952-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical resistivity imaging for investigation of seepage paths in the Yukari Gökdere Dam, Isparta, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compare qualitatively the results obtained from refraction seismic and electrical resistivity campaigns, adding the closest lithological log data in ERT 2-SRT 2 crosssections, and showing a good fit among them (Figure 6). The values of both seismic Pwave velocity and electrical resistivity that we assigned to limestones and siltstones are analogous to the values reported by the authors of [50,51] in similar settings.…”
Section: Srtsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also compare qualitatively the results obtained from refraction seismic and electrical resistivity campaigns, adding the closest lithological log data in ERT 2-SRT 2 crosssections, and showing a good fit among them (Figure 6). The values of both seismic Pwave velocity and electrical resistivity that we assigned to limestones and siltstones are analogous to the values reported by the authors of [50,51] in similar settings.…”
Section: Srtsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We also compare qualitatively the results obtained from refraction seismic and electrical resistivity campaigns, adding the closest lithological log data in ERT 2-SRT 2 crosssections, and showing a good fit among them (Figure 6). The values of both seismic P-wave velocity and electrical resistivity that we assigned to limestones and siltstones are analogous to the values reported by the authors of [50,51] A second layer is defined by higher velocities (2500 m/s < Vp < 3000 m/s), and it is placed below this first layer. The thickness of this layer is also variable with an average of 6 m (SRT 1 and SRT 4) up to more than 10 m (SRT 2).…”
Section: Srtsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Resistivity method is used to determine the subsurface rock's resistivity values distribution [9], [10]. This method can map subsurface conditions in detail with a relatively shallow depth [11], [12]. From the resistivity values distribution, it can be identified the [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%