2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical probe diagnostics for the laminar flame quenching distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An attempt is made to interpret the changes for the ionization current with the gas velocity, equivalence ratio and fuel composition. The approach builds on the work from Rodrigues (2005) and Karrer et al (2010). In the experiments conducted by Rodrigues (2005) with two electrodes inserted into a planar flame it is concluded that the drop of electrical potential takes place essentially near the cathode.…”
Section: Ionization Current Vs Dead Space Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An attempt is made to interpret the changes for the ionization current with the gas velocity, equivalence ratio and fuel composition. The approach builds on the work from Rodrigues (2005) and Karrer et al (2010). In the experiments conducted by Rodrigues (2005) with two electrodes inserted into a planar flame it is concluded that the drop of electrical potential takes place essentially near the cathode.…”
Section: Ionization Current Vs Dead Space Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiments conducted by Rodrigues (2005) with two electrodes inserted into a planar flame it is concluded that the drop of electrical potential takes place essentially near the cathode. Using a 1-D flame model, both Rodrigues (2005) and Karrer et al (2010) demonstrate that the ionization current intensity is related to the quenching distance near the cathode.…”
Section: Ionization Current Vs Dead Space Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quenching diameters in round tubes are typically 50% larger [25]. The dead space (the closest approach of a premixed flame to a wall) is about 0.1L q [26,27]. The available measurements in both air and enriched oxygen were correlated here to obtain L q = 0.267X O2 , for methane [28,29], ethylene [25], and propane [29,30], respectively, where X O2 is oxygen mole fraction in the oxidizer.…”
Section: Scaling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation (4) between the normalized wall heat flux and the Peclet number can be used in combination with the definition of the Peclet number (2) to calculate the quenching distance. Several authors validated this procedure against laminar quenching distances of methane-air flames obtained by optical [6][7][8]37] and electrical probe diagnostics [24,25]. However, the definition of the flame position and thereby the quenching distance relied on an optical criterion (chemiluminescence of CH* and C Ã…”
Section: Quenching Distance Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%