1981
DOI: 10.1104/pp.67.6.1124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical Potentials in Stomatal Complexes

Abstract: MATERIALS AND METHODSPlants and Preparation of Epyermal Samples. Plants of C. communis L. were grown in growth chambers (22/20 C day/night; 85% RH; 14.5 h light; 85 w m-2 from fluorescent tubes, General Electric FR96T12-CW-1500). The first and second fully expanded leaves were removed from the tip of a branch and the basal half of each leaf was cut into two longitudinal sections. These sections were floated, with the abaxial side up, on distilled H20 for 3 to 6 h either in the light (85 w m 2 from mercury vapo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 2 were in the range of the physiologically expected free K+ concentrations in the cell wall and the cytoplasm (2). The resting potential of nonstimulated guard cells has been postulated to be Nernstian with respect to K+ (27). The voltage sensitivity of K+ channels as described here implies that K+ fluxes into and out of guard cells may be regulated by mechanisms that produce changes in the membrane potential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…1 and 2 were in the range of the physiologically expected free K+ concentrations in the cell wall and the cytoplasm (2). The resting potential of nonstimulated guard cells has been postulated to be Nernstian with respect to K+ (27). The voltage sensitivity of K+ channels as described here implies that K+ fluxes into and out of guard cells may be regulated by mechanisms that produce changes in the membrane potential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The fact that previous attempts failed to elicit electrical responses to cyanide from guard cells (Saftner & Raschke, 1981) can be ascribed now to the deleterious effects of microelectrode salt leakage (Blatt, 1987a). Figure 2 shows the records from four cells exposed to 0.3 and 1.0 mM NaCN plus 0.4 mM SHAM (see also Table 1).…”
Section: Atp Cyanide and Guard Cell Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The positive potential may be caused by membrane damage during enzymatic treatment (Cornel et al 1983). Furthermore, potential value may also change depending on the concentration of outer ions (Saftner andRaschke 1981, Abe andTakeda 1986) and suction pressure (Pantoja and Willmer 1986).…”
Section: Vacuolar Ph Measurement Of Colored Cells Of Hydrangeamentioning
confidence: 99%