The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90247-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical-hydraulic properties of unsaturated Ottawa sands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrical properties of a sample of the sand was made using a Solartron 1260A Impedance Analyzer. The electrical and microstructural properties of the sand used in this work were found to agree very well with those obtained by Gorman and Kelly [1990] as shown in Table 1. The only slight difference is that in the measured grain diameter (502 μ m for our work and 260 μ m for the “density” grade Ottawa sand used by Gorman and Kelly [1990]).…”
Section: Sample Materialssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electrical properties of a sample of the sand was made using a Solartron 1260A Impedance Analyzer. The electrical and microstructural properties of the sand used in this work were found to agree very well with those obtained by Gorman and Kelly [1990] as shown in Table 1. The only slight difference is that in the measured grain diameter (502 μ m for our work and 260 μ m for the “density” grade Ottawa sand used by Gorman and Kelly [1990]).…”
Section: Sample Materialssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We have taken this value to represent the steady state permeability in the absence of steady state permeability on the sample. It should be noted that our measurement of κ 10 is larger than that obtained by Gorman and Kelly [1990] for Ottawa sand. They actually measured the hydraulic conductivity K of their samples, obtaining K = [4 ± 1] × 10 −4 m/s for their ‘density sand’ when packed to give a porosity of about 0.325, which is equivalent to κ DC = [0.366 ± 0.091] × 10 −10 m 2 when converted to permeability.…”
Section: Sample Materialscontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the strong correlations between σ mix and various properties of soils, including mineralogy, cation exchange capacity, grain size distribution, void ratio and water content (AbuHassanein et al, 1996;Archie, 1942;Boudreau, 1996;Campanella and Weemees, 1990;Choo et al, , 2016Fukue et al, 1999;Gorman and Kelly, 1990;Pfannkuch, 1972;Reynolds, 1997;Samouelian et al, 2005;Shen and Chen, 2007;Tiab and Donaldson, 2004;Urish, 1981;Waxman and Smits, 1968), many studies employed the electrical conductivity measurement technique as a quality monitoring tool for landfill barrier systems, including compacted clay liner (AbuHassanein et al, 1996;Kalinski and Kelly, 1994), geosynthetic clay liner (Sirieix et al, 2015), and landfill cover (Carpenter et al, 1991;Genelle et al, 2012). Therefore, the characterization of the impact of organic phase on the measured electrical conductivity of organoclays is important to use organoclays in barriers.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is influenced by several factors such as soil type, pore fluid chemistry, degree of saturation, bulk density, pore structure, and so on (e.g., Kalinski and Kelly 1994;McCarter 1984). Furthermore, the engineering behavior of soil is also comprehensively determined by all these factors (Mitchell and Soga 2005); thus, electrical resistivity can be adopted as an effective tool to study the physical and mechanical properties of soils (Gorman and Kelly 1990;Kibria and Hossain 2012). On the other hand, the electrical resistivity of a soil is very effective in the evaluation of the degree of contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%