2020
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/aba791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical Efficiency of Two-Stage Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stacks with a Fuel Regenerator

Abstract: Many studies have been conducted for the two-stage solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) module. Since there are presently no studies for the fuel regenerator's effect on the electrical efficiency of the module to the best of the authors' knowledge, the effect of removing H 2 O and/or CO 2 was investigated. To estimate the electrical efficiency, models of the two-stage SOFC stacks with a fuel regenerator that use hydrocarbon or hydrogen fuel were used. The electrical efficiency was estimated by calculating the maximum … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The anode off-gas recycling SOFC module and a two-stage SOFC module with only H 2 O removal by a fuel regenerator were compared. In our previous study, for the twostage SOFC module, the highest net AC efficiency of 68.1% (LHV) was achieved when 88.8% H 2 O was removed by the fuel regenerator (1). In this study, the highest net AC efficiency of 68.1% (LHV) for the anode off-gas recycling SOFC module was realized when 39.5% H 2 O was removed by the fuel regenerator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The anode off-gas recycling SOFC module and a two-stage SOFC module with only H 2 O removal by a fuel regenerator were compared. In our previous study, for the twostage SOFC module, the highest net AC efficiency of 68.1% (LHV) was achieved when 88.8% H 2 O was removed by the fuel regenerator (1). In this study, the highest net AC efficiency of 68.1% (LHV) for the anode off-gas recycling SOFC module was realized when 39.5% H 2 O was removed by the fuel regenerator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The results showed that the system could be operated at a high fuel utilization rate by removing CO 2 and/or H 2 O from the anode off-gas of the first-stage SOFC stack and reusing the regenerated anode off-gas as the fuel for the second-stage SOFC stack. Consequently, it generated power with high efficiency (1). We also developed an actual two-stage SOFC module with a fuel regenerator and operated it at fuel utilization rate of 91.4% with thermal selfsustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…最大发电效 率对应的工况如表 1 所示. 此外, 当 SOFC 集成在发电系统中运行时, 合理设 计系统结构, 充分利用高温尾气中的热能 [25] , 能够进一 步提高系统的总体效率 [26][27][28][29] 需要明确的是, 对于不同材料、结构和制备工艺的 电池, 由于其性能水平不同, 其最高效率所对应的燃料 利用率会有所不同, 测试中所选择的燃料流量的数值间 隔也会使结论略有差异. 在世界范围内, 德国 Julich 研 究中心的电堆能够在 85%的燃料利用率下高效运行 [16] ; 日本产业技术综合研究所(Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, AIST)的多个单电池、 电堆在 75%~80% 的燃料利用率下连续运行超过 10000 h, 也有部分电堆 尝试在 85%的燃料利用率下进行稳定性测试, 最长连续 运行 9000 h [8] .…”
Section: 引言unclassified