2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.389034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical critical dimension metrology for 100-nm linewidths and below

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the right edge shows a smaller CD than the rest of the wafer. Note that the CD values in Figure 2 are much smaller than the target CD of 130 nm due to the bias between electrical and physical CD [12]. The next step is to use this information to calculate the "average'" field by averaging the CD measurements for the five wafers at each point in the field (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the right edge shows a smaller CD than the rest of the wafer. Note that the CD values in Figure 2 are much smaller than the target CD of 130 nm due to the bias between electrical and physical CD [12]. The next step is to use this information to calculate the "average'" field by averaging the CD measurements for the five wafers at each point in the field (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, sidewall out-diffusion makes a significant effect on the constant offset. 8 Consequently,since one of the goals of this experiment is to correlate ELM process with real devices, we prefer to follow traditional poly process. We suggested silicon nitride capping layer as a protection from out-diffusion as shown in figure 4 (c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the other extreme, only 25 points per field are measured, but all 23 fields on the wafer are measured. In all cases the plans are chosen so that the total number of measurements remains roughly constant at around 600 measurements, which might require a few hours of CD-SEM time, but could be accelerated by an approximate factor of ten if one uses Electrical Linewidth Metrology (ELM) 16,17 . The sampling plans are summarized in Table 7.…”
Section: Selection Of Optimum Sampling Planmentioning
confidence: 99%