2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity of partially saturated porous media containing clay: An improved formulation

Abstract: [1] Prediction of the bulk DC electrical conductivity of partially saturated porous media containing clay has remained a significant challenge. A variety of models have been proposed; however, no single model has yet been shown to be entirely satisfactory. In this paper, we propose an improved formulation to account for partial saturation by extending an earlier proposed effective medium formulation. In order to test the performance of the proposed formulation, 28 data sets are extracted from the literature an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This formulation is consistent with the work done by Greve et al (2013) who analyzed a large database of experimental data at partial saturations to conclude that the Dukhin number should scaled according to Eq. (99) .…”
Section: Effect Of Saturationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This formulation is consistent with the work done by Greve et al (2013) who analyzed a large database of experimental data at partial saturations to conclude that the Dukhin number should scaled according to Eq. (99) .…”
Section: Effect Of Saturationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The total charge density of the diffuse and Stern layer Q V can be deduced from CEC measurements as performed by Waxman & Smits (1968), Waxman & Thomas (1974) and Vinegar & Waxman (1984). Q V is usually determined from the ratio of the cation exchange capacity per unit pore volume of rock, expressed in meq ml −1 , with 1 meq ml −1 = 96.32 × 10 6 C m −3 (Greve et al 2013). In Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These influencing factors have been well investigated by previous studies (Kalinski & Kelly, 1994;Saarenketo, 1998;Samouëlian et al, 2005;Long et al, 2012;Ondruška et al, 2018). To bridge the gap between the electrical resistivity and soil properties, serval empirical models have been proposed (Archie, 1942;Waxman & Smits, 1968;Rhoades et al, 1989;Mojid et al, 2007;Greve et al, 2013;Hasan et al, 2018). For the sandy soil, the most famous and widely adopted model is still the one proposed by Archie (1942) and is usually called Archie's law.…”
Section: Models To Interpret Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the hypothesis is true, it means the accumulation of gas bubbles in the shallow layer could help mitigate Electrical resistivity of soil is sensitive to temperature, porosity, degree of saturation (moist content), particle and pore size distribution, pore water salinity and so on (Kibria & Hossain, 2012). Serval models have been proposed to describe the relationship (Archie, 1942;Waxman & Smits, 1968;Rhoades et al, 1989;Mojid et al, 2007;Greve et al, 2013;Hasan et al, 2018), but the most popular model used for describing sandy soil is still the one proposed by Archie (1942) which is usually called Archie's law. In this model, sand particles are regarded as insulator and the conductivity of electrical current is only dominated by microscopic structure of void space and pore water salinity.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%