2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/44/389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity of iron under shock compression up to 200 GPa

Abstract: The electrical conductivity of shock-compressed iron was measured up to 208 GPa by using an improved sample assembly in which the iron sample is encapsulated in a single-crystal sapphire cell. High-pressure shock compressions were generated by plate impact with a two-stage light-gas gun. The measured conductivity of iron varies from 1.45 × 104 Ω −1 cm−1 at 101 GPa and 2010 K, to 7.65 × 103 Ω−1 cm−1 at 208 GPa and 5220 K. After analysing these data together with those reported previously, we found that the Bloc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

10
56
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) closely agree with the shock compression measurements of Keeler (10) and the lowest pressure point of Bi et al (11), at pressures where Hugoniot temperatures (25) are comparable to those in our simulations. Similarly, values for Fe 3 Si liquid are in agreement with the shock measurements of Matassov (12) for the same composition.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) closely agree with the shock compression measurements of Keeler (10) and the lowest pressure point of Bi et al (11), at pressures where Hugoniot temperatures (25) are comparable to those in our simulations. Similarly, values for Fe 3 Si liquid are in agreement with the shock measurements of Matassov (12) for the same composition.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Lower pressure shock compression measurements are at progressively lower temperatures; the 18 GPa measument of Keeler (10) is at 320 K, and agrees well with room temperature static measurements in hcp Fe (17,18), adding confidence to the shock compression resistivity data, and our results. In light of the large scatter in the Bi et al (11) dataset, and the serious disagreement between the data of Bi et al (11) and Keeler (10) above 120 GPa, we feel that comparison of our results with the measurements of Keeler (10) is more appropriate. Computed low pressure resistivity for pure Fe liquid is somewhat smaller than experimental values (26,27), yet computed ambient pressure thermal conductivity does agree closely with experimental estimates for liquid Fe at temperatures above melting (1,810 K) (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adding the impurity resistivity of silicon and nickel, Stacey and Anderson (2001) gave 2.12 Â 10 À6 X m and 2.02 Â 10 À6 X m at the CMB and the ICB, respectively. Then, new shock compression experiment was reported up to 200 GPa (Bi et al, 2002). Bi and others suggested the possibility that resistivity was underestimated in earlier shock wave experiments because of the melting of insulating epoxy at high temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi and others suggested the possibility that resistivity was underestimated in earlier shock wave experiments because of the melting of insulating epoxy at high temperature. Considering the new measurement (Bi et al, 2002), both Davies (2007) and Stacey and Loper (2007) revised the estimate by Stacey and Anderson (2001) downwardly. Davies (2007) calculated 1.25-1.9 Â 10 À6 X m for pure iron and 2.15-2.80 Â 10 À6 X m for Fe-Si alloy at the CMB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%