2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conductivity and ion diffusion in porcine meniscus: effects of strain, anisotropy, and tissue region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tissue composition was investigated to identify potential relationships with measured mechanical properties. The average φ water and φ GAG were within the ranges typically observed for porcine and human meniscus, 11,15,[53][54][55][56] see Table 2. Similar to other studies, medial menisci had significantly higher φ water and φ GAG than lateral.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Tissue composition was investigated to identify potential relationships with measured mechanical properties. The average φ water and φ GAG were within the ranges typically observed for porcine and human meniscus, 11,15,[53][54][55][56] see Table 2. Similar to other studies, medial menisci had significantly higher φ water and φ GAG than lateral.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Averaged meniscal Φ w , pooled from all groups, was 0.770 ​± ​0.032, which is comparable to previous measurements on human [ 9 , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] ] and on porcine tissues [ 9 , [39] , [40] , [41] ]. Medial meniscal samples had significantly higher Φ w on average than lateral samples (p ​< ​0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The samples were first subjected to an unconfined compression test with a universal testing machine at compression strengths of 10% and 20% strain, selected based on previous studies . The 10% strain was selected as a physiological compression strength and the 20% strain as a mechanical overload .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were first subjected to an unconfined compression test with a universal testing machine at compression strengths of 10% and 20% strain, selected based on previous studies. 23,24 The 10% strain was selected as a physiological compression strength and the 20% strain as a mechanical overload. 25 After achieving the preload condition of 0.1% strain, the indenter head speed was set at a 0.5 mm/s until 20% compression was reached.…”
Section: Biomechanical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%