“…The computational results represented in Table obey the two relations This is a quite challenging result because the general trend reported in numerous publications is just the opposite, i.e., the narrower the band gap the larger is the dielectric susceptibility. The trend is also confirmed by analysis of a large body of experimental data (see, e.g., ref ), and it is in line with the first-order perturbation theory which provides us with the following expression for the dielectric susceptibility χ (1) where k is wave vector; n and m numerate the electron states in the conduction and valence bands, respectively; M is the number of occupied bands; ε nm ( k ) = ε n ( k ) – ε m ( k ) is the energy difference between the states, and is the matrix elements of the coordinate operator. Terms with the minimum value of the denominator in eq give the main contribution to the sum, and since min ε nm ( k ) = E g , it follows that .…”