2012
DOI: 10.3390/en5030752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical Circuit Flashover Model of Polluted Insulators under AC Voltage Based on the Arc Root Voltage Gradient Criterion

Abstract: Abstract:In order to study the flashover mechanism of polluted insulators under AC voltage, a new arc propagation criterion which is based on an arc root voltage gradient is proposed. This criterion can explain the variation of the arc root voltage gradient in the arc propagation process. Based on this criterion, a new distributed parameter electrical circuit flashover model of polluted insulators is presented. The arc channel is considered as an equivalent distributed parameter circuit model instead of using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed test procedure to determine U50 is shown in [23,29]. Provided that N is the number of test results, the first flashover voltage is marked with U1, the second one U2,and the Nth Un, U50 can be expressed as: In the existing studies, the voltage distributions of the iced insulators were obtained by simulations [19][20][21], but the simulated results have not been validated by experiments.…”
Section: Electric and Flashover Performance Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detailed test procedure to determine U50 is shown in [23,29]. Provided that N is the number of test results, the first flashover voltage is marked with U1, the second one U2,and the Nth Un, U50 can be expressed as: In the existing studies, the voltage distributions of the iced insulators were obtained by simulations [19][20][21], but the simulated results have not been validated by experiments.…”
Section: Electric and Flashover Performance Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed test procedure to determine U 50 is shown in [23,29]. Provided that N is the number of test results, the first flashover voltage is marked with U 1 , the second one U 2 ,and the Nth U n , U 50 can be expressed as:…”
Section: Electric and Flashover Performance Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oscillograms also reveal that the leakage current has shown a strong fundamental component with little or no harmonics under normal conditions whereas under arcing conditions the harmonic content increases. Numerous publications [21][22][23][24] attribute this behavior to a flashover process that is nonlinear and predominantly random in nature; the surface discharges are nonlinear arcs, the Fig. 7.…”
Section: Number Of Polluted Discsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Equations (3)-(5) and analysis above, accurately calculating the surface conductivity of ice layer formed in energized condition is very important for accurately predicting flashover voltage of ice-covered insulator. References [33,34] provided a linear fitting equation which was often used to calculate the equivalent surface conductivity of ice layer. The ice sample in References [33,34] formed in the triangular glass mould was not under electric field, that is, it ignored the effect of alternating electric field during the icing process.…”
Section: Effect Of Ion Migration During Phase Transition Under Alternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [33,34] provided a linear fitting equation which was often used to calculate the equivalent surface conductivity of ice layer. The ice sample in References [33,34] formed in the triangular glass mould was not under electric field, that is, it ignored the effect of alternating electric field during the icing process. However, the experimental data in Sections 3 and 4 of this paper showed that electric field did have an effect on the conductive ion distribution of ice layer.…”
Section: Effect Of Ion Migration During Phase Transition Under Alternmentioning
confidence: 99%