2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0034616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical brain imaging reveals the expression and timing of altered error monitoring functions in major depression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, previous ERP studies already reported decreased Pe amplitude during error monitoring in depression or trait-related negative affect (Aarts et al, 2013;Alexopoulos et al, 2007;A. J. Holmes & Pizzagalli, 2010;Olvet et al, 2010;Schrijvers et al, 2009;Schroder et al, 2013),which can be considered -with some reservation however since trait and state effects do not always produce comparable changes in PM -as the opposite mood state compared to the emotion (transiently) experienced in the happy mood group in this study, yet with a similar electrophysiological effect seen in both cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, previous ERP studies already reported decreased Pe amplitude during error monitoring in depression or trait-related negative affect (Aarts et al, 2013;Alexopoulos et al, 2007;A. J. Holmes & Pizzagalli, 2010;Olvet et al, 2010;Schrijvers et al, 2009;Schroder et al, 2013),which can be considered -with some reservation however since trait and state effects do not always produce comparable changes in PM -as the opposite mood state compared to the emotion (transiently) experienced in the happy mood group in this study, yet with a similar electrophysiological effect seen in both cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Noteworthy, the lack of group differences at the behavioral level (speed and accuracy) was not odd in the present case, but expected given the specifics of the Go/NoGo task used. Since the RT deadline was calibrated and updated at the single subject level, it inevitably led to a comparable number of response errors (and balanced speed) between the two groups, as already reported in previous studies using the same task and between-subjects experimental design (see Aarts & Pourtois, 2010;Aarts et al, 2013;Koban, Brass, Lynn, & Pourtois, 2012;Rigoni, Pourtois, & Brass, 2015;Walentowska, Moors, Paul, & Pourtois, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Individuals with schizophrenia show reductions in the ERN (Alain et al, 2002;Mathalon et al, 2002), whereas those with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and OCD show increases (Gehring et al, 2000;Endrass and Ullsperger, 2014;Xiao et al, 2011). The findings in major depressive disorder are mixed, with some studies showing increases in ERN amplitude (Chiu and Deldin, 2007;Holmes and Pizzagalli, 2008;Aarts et al, 2013) and others decreases (Ruchsow et al, 2006) or no difference (Compton et al, 2008;Schrijvers et al, 2009). Co-morbid conditions that occur with depression may account for some of the mixed results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%