2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00086-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric source imaging of human brain functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
157
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
157
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We used LORETA to estimate the intracerebral sources of EEG activity. While different analysing models have advantages and disadvantages (Michel et al 2001), several recent studies have successfully employed LORETA as a reliable tool for localising cortical activation in various tasks ranging from visual and auditory to complex cognitive tasks (Pizzagalli et al 2000;Vitacco et al 2002;Esslen et al 2004;Mulert et al 2004a). Interestingly, the combined use of LORETA and fMRI revealed similar cortical maps to those obtained with fMRI and LORETA separately (Vitacco et al 2002;Mulert et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used LORETA to estimate the intracerebral sources of EEG activity. While different analysing models have advantages and disadvantages (Michel et al 2001), several recent studies have successfully employed LORETA as a reliable tool for localising cortical activation in various tasks ranging from visual and auditory to complex cognitive tasks (Pizzagalli et al 2000;Vitacco et al 2002;Esslen et al 2004;Mulert et al 2004a). Interestingly, the combined use of LORETA and fMRI revealed similar cortical maps to those obtained with fMRI and LORETA separately (Vitacco et al 2002;Mulert et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In extension, it provides insights into how groups or conditions differ in terms of likely underlying neurophysiologic mechanisms (Murray et al, 2008;Michel & Murray, 2012), in addition to the temporal information about ERP differences. This method is independent of the reference electrode (Michel et al, 2001(Michel et al, , 2004) and insensitive to pure amplitude modulations across conditions (since topographies of normalized maps are compared). The spatio-temporal segmentation was applied to the group-averaged data (from picture onset to 100ms before articulation) of the four sub-groups: "matched" controls, "other" controls, "phonological-dominant" patient and "phonetic-dominant" patient sub-groups.…”
Section: This Analysis Entails a Spatio-temporal Segmentation Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is independent of the reference electrode (Michel et al, 2001(Michel et al, , 2004) and insensitive to pure amplitude modulations across conditions (topographies of normalized maps are compared). A modified hierarchical clustering analysis (Michel et al, 2001;Pascual-Marqui, Michel, & Lehmann, 1995), the agglomerative hierarchical clustering (Murray, Brunet, & Michel, 2008) was used to determine the most dominant configurations of the electric field at the scalp (topographic maps). A modified cross-validation criterion was used to determine the optimal number of maps that explained the best the group-averaged data sets across conditions.…”
Section: Topographic Pattern Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%