2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric signals regulate directional migration of ventral midbrain derived dopaminergic neural progenitor cells via Wnt/GSK3β signaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking a bioengineering approach, several works have reported that electric fields can be used to stimulate and direct the migration (termed galvanotaxis) of neural stem cells in vitro or ex vivo [1317]. These experiments are based upon the understanding that endogenous electrical signals are present in many developing systems [18], and that crucial cellular behaviors are under the influence of such endogenous electric cues including: cell division, migration, and differentiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a bioengineering approach, several works have reported that electric fields can be used to stimulate and direct the migration (termed galvanotaxis) of neural stem cells in vitro or ex vivo [1317]. These experiments are based upon the understanding that endogenous electrical signals are present in many developing systems [18], and that crucial cellular behaviors are under the influence of such endogenous electric cues including: cell division, migration, and differentiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EF can be delivered to cells by direct contact of electrodes with cells and the culture medium [38][39][40][41][42] or through a noncontact approach, which isolates electrodes from cells and the culture medium and capacitively couples EF to cells and the culture medium as reported by us [3] and others [43][44][45][46]. Overall, experimental results suggest that different combinations of EF intensity, frequency and/or polarization with respect to the cell, as well as methods of EF delivery, can elicit a variety of distinct cell responses, making mechanistic studies of the EF-cell interactions quite difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical models of leading-edge protrusion depend upon a dendritic actin network that undergoes continuous reassembly in order to form ruffling lamellipodia [25,26]. We have previously demonstrated that specific signaling molecules, such as PIP3 and CLASP2, will tend to accumulate along the leading edges of migrating neural stem/progenitor cells along with various cytoskeletal components—including actin [20,21]. In this study, F-actin was found to be asymmetrically redistributed to favor the leading edges of OPCs migrating in an EF (Figure 3b,e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often attending the acquisition of viable cells are relevant investigations into cellular motility and signal-driven migration. Consequently, several methods have utilized either biochemical or biophysical means in an attempt to regulate stem cell migration [21,22,27,28,29]. Electric fields have the capacity to function as guidance cues to regulate the migration of both endogenous and grafted neural stem cells [14,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation