2022
DOI: 10.7120/09627286.31.4.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric shock control of farmed animals: Welfare review and ethical critique

Abstract: The available methods of electric shock control or containment of farmed animals are increasing and potentially include: (i) fixed and movable electric fencing; (ii) cattle trainers; (iii) prods or goads; (iv) wires in poultry barns; (v) dairy collecting yard backing gates; (vi) automated milking systems (milking robots); and (vii) collars linked to virtual fencing and containment systems. Since any electric shock is likely to cause a farmed animal pain, any such control or containment must, to be ethically j… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrafreeloading of this magnitude for a high-concentrate ration is unprecedented and is particularly striking because it was observed despite an aversive stimulus and high average AUC values. Considering that cattle exhibit avoidance behavior when 6,000 µA is applied to the rump ( Whittlestone et al, 1975 ) and aversion to electrical current is well documented in cattle (e.g., Pajor et al., 2000 ; reviewed by Grumett and Butterworth, 2022 ), it is compelling that TMR animals willingly touched up to 2,500 µA to contrafreeload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrafreeloading of this magnitude for a high-concentrate ration is unprecedented and is particularly striking because it was observed despite an aversive stimulus and high average AUC values. Considering that cattle exhibit avoidance behavior when 6,000 µA is applied to the rump ( Whittlestone et al, 1975 ) and aversion to electrical current is well documented in cattle (e.g., Pajor et al., 2000 ; reviewed by Grumett and Butterworth, 2022 ), it is compelling that TMR animals willingly touched up to 2,500 µA to contrafreeload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of electric wiring at various specific points within the facilities is an example of a stress-inducing interference. This device is used to prevent perching behavior on equipment, as well as on feeders and drinkers, to prevent nesting on the sides of the poultry houses, and to inhibit innate behaviors [ 48 ]. An electric current of sufficient magnitude, when passing through an organism, can cause adverse effects on an animal’s well-being, including painful sensations, suffering, injuries, or death.…”
Section: Physiology Of Fear and Aversion Vs Abnormal Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%