2017
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric properties tomography: Biochemical, physical and technical background, evaluation and clinical applications

Abstract: Electric properties tomography (EPT) derives the patient's electric properties, i.e. conductivity and permittivity, using standard magnetic resonance (MR) systems and standard MR sequences. Thus, EPT does not apply externally mounted electrodes, currents or radiofrequency (RF) probes, as is the case in competing techniques. EPT is quantitative MR, i.e. it yields absolute values of conductivity and permittivity. This review summarizes the physical equations underlying EPT, the corresponding basic and advanced r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
172
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
172
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiofrequency phase maps that can be retrieved from Eq. () can potentially be used for electric properties tomography . We did not focus on it in this study, but provided the examples of RF phase maps in human brain (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiofrequency phase maps that can be retrieved from Eq. () can potentially be used for electric properties tomography . We did not focus on it in this study, but provided the examples of RF phase maps in human brain (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that bSSFP is the most favorable phase‐measuring method for MREPT because of its speed, motion insensitivity, automatic eddy current compensation, and high SNR . However, bSSFP phase is susceptible to off‐resonance and T 2 effects, and it is vulnerable especially in certain regions where banding artifact occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in our study, for sodium MR imaging, a twisted projection read out was implemented, which allows for much shorter TE (0.4 ms) compared to the gradient echo sequence in the reference study (1.36 ms), and additional sodium coil inhomogeneity correction was performed to deliver high‐quality quantitative sodium images. Finally, MREPT‐based conductivity mapping seems more suitable for low field strength where the assumption that the transmit and receive phases are the same is more valid …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%