2013
DOI: 10.3808/jei.201300245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric Power System Planning under Uncertainty Using Inexact Inventory Nonlinear Programming Method

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In this study, an inexact inventory nonlinear programming (IINP) model is proposed for supporting electric power system planning under multiple unit prices and uncertain demands. The proposed IINP can deal with uncertainties presented as intervals and address nonlinearities in the objective function. It can also help to solve material supply problem with diverse unit prices as well as what, where, when and how much material should be purchased under uncertainty. Then, the IINP is applied to a case st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In real-world water resources management problems, complexities in water allocation problems where interactive and dynamic relationships exist within a multistage context are desired to reflect. Besides, uncertain parameters may be expressed as interval values with known lower and upper bounds, but unknown membership or distribution functions (Suo et al 2013;Xu and Qin 2013). For uncertainties in left-and right-hand sides and cost/revenue parameters in the objective function, an extended consideration is the introduction of techniques of IPP and MSP into the IJP framework.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real-world water resources management problems, complexities in water allocation problems where interactive and dynamic relationships exist within a multistage context are desired to reflect. Besides, uncertain parameters may be expressed as interval values with known lower and upper bounds, but unknown membership or distribution functions (Suo et al 2013;Xu and Qin 2013). For uncertainties in left-and right-hand sides and cost/revenue parameters in the objective function, an extended consideration is the introduction of techniques of IPP and MSP into the IJP framework.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a number of systems inexact optimization methods that could tackle the above uncertainties and complexities were employed for assisting development of regional electric power systems management plans [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. For example, Cai et al [20] developed an interactive decision support system based on an inexact optimization model to aid decision makers in planning energy management systems, where uncertainties in energyrelated parameters were effectively addressed through the interval-parameter programming approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The lower and upper bounds represents the minimum and maximum value of parameters, which can tackle uncertainties that generally cannot be quantified as either distribution functions or membership functions, since interval numbers are acceptable as its uncertain inputs (Suo et al, 2013). Consequently, to determine the hedging alternatives accounting for uncertainties expressed as discrete intervals, the concepts of IPP and MRR will be incorporated into a general framework.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the MRR has an advantage in providing effective decision support under uncertainty; however, more uncertainties that exist in the left-hand sides and the objective function of model (2) may also need to be reflected. Intervalparameter programming (IPP) is an alternative for tackling uncertainties expressed as intervals that exist in the model's leftand/or right-hand sides as well as the objective function (Suo et al, 2013). The IPP has advantages such that (i) it allows uncertainties to be directly communicated into the optimization process, (ii) it does not lead to more complicated intermediate models, and thus has a relatively low computational requirement and (iii) it does not require distributional information for model parameters, which is particularly meaningful for practical applications because it is typically much more difficult for planners/engineers to specify distributions than to obtain intervals (Huang et al, 1995;Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%