1996
DOI: 10.1021/jp960412n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric Polarizability and Hyperpolarizability of Carbon Monoxide

Abstract: We report an extensive ab initio study of the electric dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability of carbon monoxide. The bond length dependence of the molecular properties has been determined from finite-field complete fourth-order many-body perturbation theory and coupled cluster calculations with very large, well-optimized basis sets of Gaussian functions. The mean dipole polarizability ᾱ and the anisotropy Δα vary around the experimental bond length of R e = 2.132 221 a 0 as ᾱ(R)/e 2 a 0 2 E h -1 = 13… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
74
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
12
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we calculated the polarizabilities by using the coupled perturbed Hartree-Fock (CPHF) approach at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ level. A test B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ calculation performed on a CO molecule gave a polarizability of 1.95 Å 3 , which is in good agreement with the experimental [41] and theoretical [42] value of 1.95 Å 3 . The calculated polarizabilities are also shown in figure 1.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this work, we calculated the polarizabilities by using the coupled perturbed Hartree-Fock (CPHF) approach at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ level. A test B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ calculation performed on a CO molecule gave a polarizability of 1.95 Å 3 , which is in good agreement with the experimental [41] and theoretical [42] value of 1.95 Å 3 . The calculated polarizabilities are also shown in figure 1.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The LB94 values are too low, on the other hand, but for ␥ they seem to be slightly preferable to the HF, LDA, and BLYP values. Using the large basis set CCSD͑T͒ results by Maroulis 47 as the benchmark, the HF value for ␤ ʈ ͓Maroulis obtained 24.75, 47 ␥ xxxx ϭ1100 ͑1200͒; ␥ zzzz 610 ͑630͒, which is quite satisfactory. Once again, the numerical and basis set errors in our results seem to be substantially smaller than the errors introduced through the approximations for the xc potential.…”
Section: F Comentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recently, we developed a refined model that uses fluctuating charges on the C and O atom sites and at the center of mass (9). This model reproduces high-level ab initio calculations of the dipole and quadrupole moment over a wide range of intermolecular separations (10,11) and allows the calculation of the infrared spectrum associated with the CO vibration. The model correctly describes the experimentally observed existence of the docking site within the distal heme pocket as well as the migration of the ligand through the protein to the xenon-4 pocket, which has been observed for various mutants (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%