1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.6420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric-field–temperature phase diagram of the relaxor ferroelectric lanthanum-modified lead zirconate titanate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
118
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
16
118
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In PLZT, the same line has been observed on ZFHaFC and it was shown that the depolarization takes place at this line. 22,40 This implies that the ferroelectric phase becomes unstable above this line. Below this line, the ferroelectric phase is metastable but it can nucleate above the threshold field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In PLZT, the same line has been observed on ZFHaFC and it was shown that the depolarization takes place at this line. 22,40 This implies that the ferroelectric phase becomes unstable above this line. Below this line, the ferroelectric phase is metastable but it can nucleate above the threshold field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is in agreement with measurements on ceramic PLZT. 22 In Fig. 7͑a͒, we show a common E-T phase diagram for a system experiencing a first-order phase transition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…106 It should be noted that due to the history-dependent properties in the non-ergodic state of canonical relaxors 100 , isothermal (red) and isofield (blue) representations differ. 106,107 An electric field induced phase transition that originates from an ergodic state will be reversible, whereas from a non-ergodic state (below ) will be irreversible. Increasing temperature without an external electric field destabilizes the induced ferroelectric state.…”
Section: Equation 217mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decay of the induced ferroelectric state to the relaxor state occurs at − ~ 50 °C (Figure 5.41) and is attributed mostly to core regions and regions of the shells adjacent to them. It is noted that this transition is dependent on poling conditions 106,107 and thus a direct comparison between different studies should be made carefully. The freezing of PNRs into a non-ergodic state occurred at ~ 20 °C and is mostly attributed to shells.…”
Section: 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the temperature-dependent strain properties are commonly expected to be poor because the electric field for a relaxor-to-ferroelectric transition increases significantly with temperature. 6,7 This finding means that the driving electric field must be accordingly increased with increasing temperature to preserve the expected strain values. However, such an effect is practically impossible to achieve due to the simultaneous decrease in the breakdown electric field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%