2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.78.044036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric field in 3D gravity with torsion

Abstract: It is shown that in static and spherically symmetric configurations of the system of Maxwell field coupled to 3D gravity with torsion, at least one of the Maxwell field components has to vanish. Restricting our attention to the electric sector of the theory, we find an interesting exact solution, corresponding to the azimuthal electric field. Its geometric structure is to a large extent influenced by the values of two different central charges, associated to the asymptotic AdS structure of spacetime.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, form (4.7) and (4.8), we deduce that we cannot have simultaneously two non-zero electric field components. This result is similar to the known no-go theorem of 3D GR-like gravity [69,70], which states that configurations with two non-vanishing components of the Maxwell field are dynamically not allowed. However, it is not valid anymore if we add the magnetic sector, as we will see in subsection 4.3 (it holds only for D=3).…”
Section: Jhep02(2013)039supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, form (4.7) and (4.8), we deduce that we cannot have simultaneously two non-zero electric field components. This result is similar to the known no-go theorem of 3D GR-like gravity [69,70], which states that configurations with two non-vanishing components of the Maxwell field are dynamically not allowed. However, it is not valid anymore if we add the magnetic sector, as we will see in subsection 4.3 (it holds only for D=3).…”
Section: Jhep02(2013)039supporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is easy to see that the theory described by the above Lagrangian is not a torsion free one (for 3D gravities with torsion see [204][205][206]). If one eliminates the last two terms in the Lagrangian (657), one may interpret the obtained Lagrangian as a Lagrangian of the Mielke-Baekler model [207] non-minimally coupled to a scalar field.…”
Section: A Minimal Massive Gravity Coupled To a Scalar Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see that the theory described by the above Lagrangian is not a torsion-free one (for 3D gravity models with torsion refer to [47][48][49]). If the two last terms in the Lagrangian (14) are eliminated, the obtained Lagrangian can be interpreted as a Lagrangian of the Mielke-Baekler model [46], non-minimally coupled to a scalar field.…”
Section: Minimal Massive Gravity Coupled To a Scalar Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%