1977
DOI: 10.1021/ja00452a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric field effects on the carbon-13 chemical shifts of model compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…values are, and the correlation with E, is slightly better than that for cr, (Table 6,(24)(25)(26). Correlation of S(C-1) with E, is also improved slightly; the 'corrected' S(C-2) values cover a narrower range, and the correlation is poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…values are, and the correlation with E, is slightly better than that for cr, (Table 6,(24)(25)(26). Correlation of S(C-1) with E, is also improved slightly; the 'corrected' S(C-2) values cover a narrower range, and the correlation is poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is 3-fold greater than the corresponding effects at other ring carbons (London,198 1) or for C, of leucine (Tran-Dinh et al, 1974). Major changes in chemical shift at carbons involved in unsaturated bonds have been predicted by the calculations of Batchelor (1975), Seidman & Maciel (1977, and specifically for amino acids by Horsley & Sternlicht (1968).…”
Section: 72mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 13C n.m.r. The validity of Apr values obtained for different peptides is based on the assumption that the observed upfield shift for Cp reflects a ''y effect" mechanism (Seidman & Maciel, 1977) or an electric field effect due to the carbonyl oxygen (Batchelor, 1975); in either case, the dihedral angle will be the only relevant parameter and the results should be nearly independent of the particular residue following the proline. 3).…”
Section: Concentration Dependence Of the Acpronhme Shifts In Cdc13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A&Y = 6.0 p.pm. Based on recent theoretical evaluations of the reffect (Seidman & Maciel, 1977), the upfield shift of Cp should depend on the orientation of the Cp protons relative to the oxygen atom. However, the values for f will be most valid for peptides possessing a relatively large amount of y-turn structure.…”
Section: Concentration Dependence Of the Acpronhme Shifts In Cdc13mentioning
confidence: 99%