2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41535-020-00306-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric-field-driven octahedral rotation in perovskite

Abstract: Rotation of MO6 (M = transition metal) octahedra is a key determinant of the physical properties of perovskite materials. Therefore, tuning physical properties, one of the most important goals in condensed matter research, may be accomplished by controlling octahedral rotation (OR). In this study, it is demonstrated that OR can be driven by an electric field in Sr2RuO4. Rotated octahedra in the surface layer of Sr2RuO4 are restored to the unrotated bulk structure upon dosing the surface with K. Theoretical inv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63 For the piezoelectric coupling, piezoelectricity is normally symmetry forbidden in room temperature STO because it is centrosymmetric, but the recent discovery of a surface piezoelectric effect induced by interfacial electric fields (i.e., electrostriction) 64 and surface relaxation 65 indicates that such an effect is present, possibly to a large extent, at the STO/ water interface. It is also worth noting that such a surface piezoelectric effect has been associated with perovskite octahedra rotation, 66 which could reduce the effects of strain on OER activity. 21 Other than deformations directly associated with the hole polaron, 43 changes in free carrier concentrations can also contribute to interfacial strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 For the piezoelectric coupling, piezoelectricity is normally symmetry forbidden in room temperature STO because it is centrosymmetric, but the recent discovery of a surface piezoelectric effect induced by interfacial electric fields (i.e., electrostriction) 64 and surface relaxation 65 indicates that such an effect is present, possibly to a large extent, at the STO/ water interface. It is also worth noting that such a surface piezoelectric effect has been associated with perovskite octahedra rotation, 66 which could reduce the effects of strain on OER activity. 21 Other than deformations directly associated with the hole polaron, 43 changes in free carrier concentrations can also contribute to interfacial strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the electric fields studied in bulk, we are very far from the insulating-metal transition. As a consequence of the volume changes under the electric field, there will also be changes in the octahedral rotations [ 54 ] that we do not analyze here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may come from the following reasons. For the case of ARPES measurements, charge doping from K atoms is confined to a few surface layers [ 44 ] and ARPES probes only the doped layers due to its surface sensitivity [ 49 ] (see Supporting Information for ARPES data regarding K dosing of a thicker SRO film and detailed discussion on surface sensitivity of AMD and ARPES). On the other hand, the measured Hall effect is averaged over the entire thickness of the film in ionic‐liquid gating experiments, resulting in weakened gating effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a key difference is the amount of induced charges. The electric field produced by the alkali metal on the SrO surface is of the order 1 V Å −1 , [44] while the electric field produced by liquid gating is of the order 0.1 V Å −1 . [36,45,46] Thus, the AMD method should induce an order of magnitude more charge carriers into the system compared to the ionic-liquid gating method, which would result in a significantly larger change in E F (see Supporting Information for detailed quantitative analysis).…”
Section: R N E H N E H N E H H Hmentioning
confidence: 99%