2019
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201900953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric‐Field‐Assisted Enhanced Electron Transfer to Boost Supercapacitor Negative Electrode Performance for a Fabricated Fe7S8/α‐FeOOH Nano‐Heterostructure

Abstract: nevertheless, they usually put undue emphasis on the capacity of the positive electrode, instead. There are few reports that discuss the negative electrode materials relatively. As a result, the capacity of the negative electrodes is much lower than that of the positive electrodes, and the capacity mismatch between the positive and negative electrodes is more serious. [6] As a matter of fact, similar to "cask effect," the capacity of the negative electrode is the shortest plank for supercapacitor, which decide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the GCD curves, the calculated capacities are 98.9, 78.2, 64.8, 56.2, and 33.9 mAh g –1 for PEGMA-ZHS with 1.32 wt % KOH and 69.0, 41.9, 33.5, 27.8, and 23.4 mAh g –1 for PEGMA-ZHS with 3.95 wt % KOH at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 A g –1 current densities, respectively. The Ragone plot of PEGMA-ZHS is shown in Figure K. , The PEGMA-ZHS displays an outstanding energy density of 356.6 Wh kg –1 at a power density of 2647.4 W kg –1 , which is superior to most previously reported hydrogel-based supercapacitors. Furthermore, according to Figure J, our prepared PEGMA-ZHS shows outstanding cyclic stability compared to the recently reported ionic hydrogel supercapacitors (Table S1) and the capacity retention and Coulombic efficiency could still maintain 100% without loss after charging/discharging for 10,000 cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the GCD curves, the calculated capacities are 98.9, 78.2, 64.8, 56.2, and 33.9 mAh g –1 for PEGMA-ZHS with 1.32 wt % KOH and 69.0, 41.9, 33.5, 27.8, and 23.4 mAh g –1 for PEGMA-ZHS with 3.95 wt % KOH at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 A g –1 current densities, respectively. The Ragone plot of PEGMA-ZHS is shown in Figure K. , The PEGMA-ZHS displays an outstanding energy density of 356.6 Wh kg –1 at a power density of 2647.4 W kg –1 , which is superior to most previously reported hydrogel-based supercapacitors. Furthermore, according to Figure J, our prepared PEGMA-ZHS shows outstanding cyclic stability compared to the recently reported ionic hydrogel supercapacitors (Table S1) and the capacity retention and Coulombic efficiency could still maintain 100% without loss after charging/discharging for 10,000 cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there was a poor match between the positive and negative electrodes. 10 Therefore, it was necessary to explore and construct advanced negative electrode materials with high capacitance. At present, carbon-based materials account for the majority of the materials to build the negative electrode of supercapacitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%