1977
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197705000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electret Induced Callus Formation in the Rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the present method was perfectly free from edematous damage by the electric current. The electrically polarized HAp ceramics continuously maintained electrostatic forces for more than 60 days while the polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon®)37, 38 electret polymer for electric stimulation became discharged and was ineffective within 7 days. Although piezoelectric polymers, such as poly‐γ‐methyl‐ L ‐glutamate (PMLG),38, 39 were delivering on the order of 1 pAcm −2 current, the polymers were bio‐incompatible and unsuitable for the scaffold of osteoblastic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the present method was perfectly free from edematous damage by the electric current. The electrically polarized HAp ceramics continuously maintained electrostatic forces for more than 60 days while the polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon®)37, 38 electret polymer for electric stimulation became discharged and was ineffective within 7 days. Although piezoelectric polymers, such as poly‐γ‐methyl‐ L ‐glutamate (PMLG),38, 39 were delivering on the order of 1 pAcm −2 current, the polymers were bio‐incompatible and unsuitable for the scaffold of osteoblastic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] A more permanent electrically polarized material, such as Teflon, showed accelerated osteointegration and bone first formed at the negative pole, growing toward the positive pole. 12,24 Furthermore, electrically polarized bioactive HAp showed improved osteointegration at the negatively charged surface pole. [25][26][27] Since electrical polarization showed improved bone formation at negatively charged surfaces of different biomaterials, functionalizing polymer surface with fixed negative electrical charge could in theory enhance any biomaterial's osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%