2000
DOI: 10.1162/003355300554836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electoral Competition Under the Threat of Political Unrest

Abstract: We study elections in which one party (the strong party) controls a source of political unrest; e.g., this party could instigate riots if it lost the election.We show that the strong party is more likely to win the election when there is less information about its ability to cause unrest. This is because when the weak party is better informed, it can more reliably prevent political unrest by implementing a "centrist" policy. When there is uncertainty over the credibility of the threat, "posturing" by the stron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is simply a binary choice for the poor (already the median voter and thus the tax setters in the democracy). The article closest to ours is Ellman and Wantchekon (2000) who study electoral competition under the threat of political unrest. As in our model the decision whether to respond with riots (disruptive interference) is made after elections have taken place and the possibility of riots affects the platform choice of parties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is simply a binary choice for the poor (already the median voter and thus the tax setters in the democracy). The article closest to ours is Ellman and Wantchekon (2000) who study electoral competition under the threat of political unrest. As in our model the decision whether to respond with riots (disruptive interference) is made after elections have taken place and the possibility of riots affects the platform choice of parties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it relates to the literature that examines the specific workings of new democracies in terms of their economic and political outcomes. Some examples are Ellman and Wantchekon (2000); Brender and Drazen (2005, 2008Keefer (2007); and Keefer and Vlaicu (2007). My paper contributes to this literature by analyzing the incentives to engage in voter intimidation and clientelism from the local government standpoint and by finding evidence of these patterns, using a novel dataset for the first democratic election in Indonesia post-Soeharto.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The political role of extra-parliamentary pressure groups has been examined by Ellman and Wantchekon (2000). More generally, the commitment problems that result from the transient nature of de facto power is an important feature of the models of revolution and democratisation that have been developed by Robinson (2001, 2006).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%