1980
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800715)46:2<386::aid-cncr2820460229>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elective versus therapeutic radical neck dissection in epidermoid carcinoma of the oral. Cavity results of a randomized clinical trial

Abstract: This study concerns 75 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who were patients at the Gustave-Roussy Institute between December 1966 and July 1973. These patients were divided into two groups. The first group was comprised of 39 patients who underwent elective radical neck dissection; nodal involvement was present in 49% with capsular rupture in 13%. In the second group of 36, neck disease appeared during follow up in 19 cases. Therapeutic radical neck dissection was carried out in 17; the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
152
1
8

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
152
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the considerable probability of occult metastases, Hicks, 12 Kligermann, 22 and Cunningham 11 consider the performance of an elective neck dissection to be essential. Conversely, Davidson, 24 Vandenbrouck, 25 and Ho 26 found no difference in survival between patients with and without elective neck dissection and hence favor a wait-and-see approach. Our own data show a significantly higher rate of cervical recurrence with no neck dissection but no relevant worsening of the survival probability and would therefore justify a wait-and-see approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the considerable probability of occult metastases, Hicks, 12 Kligermann, 22 and Cunningham 11 consider the performance of an elective neck dissection to be essential. Conversely, Davidson, 24 Vandenbrouck, 25 and Ho 26 found no difference in survival between patients with and without elective neck dissection and hence favor a wait-and-see approach. Our own data show a significantly higher rate of cervical recurrence with no neck dissection but no relevant worsening of the survival probability and would therefore justify a wait-and-see approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date four randomized control trials (RCT) have been conducted to address this issue. Two of these included only cancer of the tongue [2,3] and the other two [4,5] have included other early cancers of the oral cavity. However, the results of these trials have not provided a satisfactory answer to the controversy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a postoperative external beam irradiation of the neck is delivered, the implanted area is protected by a cerrobend block. At the moment, despite a randomised trial comparing the two attitudes and showing similar results, there is no consensus on this point (55,56 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%