2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with endovascular or open repair: The first decade

Abstract: Open repair and EVAR are both performed safely in patients treated for elective infrarenal AAA. EVAR has the perioperative advantages of reduced blood loss, reduced length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and increased number of patients discharged to home. The mid-term survival advantage of open repair has been observed in other reports and deserves further study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Compared to open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, EVAR has a short-term survival benefit, as well as other perioperative advantages, such as decreased blood transfusion and shorter-length of hospital stay. 2,3 However, a significant number of patients with infrarenal AAAs continue to undergo open repair. Open surgery remains the definitive treatment for patients with infrarenal AAA of mycotic or connective tissue disease etiology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Compared to open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, EVAR has a short-term survival benefit, as well as other perioperative advantages, such as decreased blood transfusion and shorter-length of hospital stay. 2,3 However, a significant number of patients with infrarenal AAAs continue to undergo open repair. Open surgery remains the definitive treatment for patients with infrarenal AAA of mycotic or connective tissue disease etiology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This minimally invasive option offers patients a treatment with less morbidity and mortality than conventional open aneurysm surgery. [1][2][3] The technique is, however, usable only in patients with suitable proximal and distal sealing zones. This is true in 50-70% of patients, the remaining patients have inadequate fixation and seal in the proximal aortic neck or iliac vessels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate surgical approach should be determined considering each individual's characteristics and comorbid diseases. [8,[27][28][29] In conclusion, in the present study, AAA patients who were admitted to our clinic over the last 10 years were investigated retrospectively, and treatment outcomes and risk factors were evaluated. We can suggest that a preoperative detailed evaluation of factors affecting the mortality and morbidity rates along with possible complications in patients is needed, especially in the presence of CAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%