Election cycles and global religious intolerance

Abstract

Mass elections are key mechanisms for collective decision-making. But they are also blamed for creating intergroup enmity, particularly while they are underway; politicians use polarizing campaign strategies, and losing sides feel resentful and marginalized after results are announced. I investigate the impact of election proximity–that is, closeness to elections in time–on social cleavages related to religion, a salient form of group identity worldwide. Integrating data from ∼1.2 million respondents across 25 cross-country survey series, I find no evidence that people interviewed shortly before or after national elections are more likely to express negative attitudes toward religious outgroups than those interviewed at other times. Subgroup analysis reveals little heterogeneity, including by levels of political competition. Generalized social trust, too, is unaffected by election calendars. Elections may not pose as great a risk to social cohesion as is commonly feared.

Attitudes and Considerations of Voters in the Philippine National Elections

“…Election is one of the most important tools for supporting national decision-making. Politicians use divisive campaign strategies, and after the results are announced, the losing sides feel bitter and isolated (Nellis, 2023). Furthermore, one of the primary concerns of all democratic nations worldwide is the potential for decreased voting behavior in some countries if elections are held between 2019 and 2022 (Giommoni et al, 2020).…”