2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2008.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Election and rendezvous with incomparable labels

Abstract: International audienceIn “Can we elect if we cannot compare” (SPAA'03), Barrière, Flocchini, Fraigniaud and Santoro consider a qualitative model of distributed computing, where the labels of the entities are distinct but mutually incomparable. They study the leader election problem in a distributed mobile environment and they wonder whether there exists an algorithm such that for each distributed mobile environment, it either states that the problem cannot be solved in this environment, or it successfully elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we show that the problem of RVwA is solvable in exactly those instances where rendezvous with common port numbering is possible. In contrast, in the qualitative model of Barrière et al [4,9] the class of solvable instances is much larger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, we show that the problem of RVwA is solvable in exactly those instances where rendezvous with common port numbering is possible. In contrast, in the qualitative model of Barrière et al [4,9] the class of solvable instances is much larger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(Step E) Agent r removes the two tokens from its homebase (Step F) Agent r goes to each homebase h, and waits until either there is no token on h, or there is a sleeping agent on h. Constructing an order on equivalence classes: Given any vertex-labelled graph (G, μ), there exists standard procedures for partitioning the vertex set of G to obtain an ordered sequence of equivalence classes that respect the labelling. (See [4,9] for example.) Note that since the agents start with the same labelled graph (G, μ), they compute the same ordered sequence of equivalence classes.…”
Section: If (G χP) Is Not Symmetric-covering-minimal Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each node v i is connected to its two neighbours v i−1 and v i+1 via distinctly labeled ports q i− and q i+ , respectively (all operations on the indices are modulo n); the labeling of the ports may not be globally consistent, thus might not provide an orientation, and the label may not be comparable [14]. The ring is said to be anonymous if the nodes have no distinguishable identifiers, and with landmark if there is a node (the landmark) which is different from all others.…”
Section: Model and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%