2010
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2010.500507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

eLearning 2.0 and new literacies: are social practices lagging behind?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important, therefore, to remind ourselves that the core issue here is that of potential contradictions between the use of web 2.0 technologies -and the cultural expectations and mores of that use --and the established practices and implications of traditional cultures and pedagogies in higher education. Noting that web 2.0 is a social and participatory web, Lim et al (2010) argue that the use of such technology encourages community building and participation, and that, importantly, this differs significantly from previous (web 1.0) online education, where content was generated then delivered for passive consumption. The implication of this shift represents, Lim et al claim, a new paradigm of higher education, which "presents unique and complex challenges" (p. 205) in the breaking of traditional pedagogical cultures and the creation of virtual spaces that are open for students to interact with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is important, therefore, to remind ourselves that the core issue here is that of potential contradictions between the use of web 2.0 technologies -and the cultural expectations and mores of that use --and the established practices and implications of traditional cultures and pedagogies in higher education. Noting that web 2.0 is a social and participatory web, Lim et al (2010) argue that the use of such technology encourages community building and participation, and that, importantly, this differs significantly from previous (web 1.0) online education, where content was generated then delivered for passive consumption. The implication of this shift represents, Lim et al claim, a new paradigm of higher education, which "presents unique and complex challenges" (p. 205) in the breaking of traditional pedagogical cultures and the creation of virtual spaces that are open for students to interact with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the paper does not focus on empirical research or development of a new pedagogical tool, it presents instructional ideas related to the use of web 2.0 technologies and potential issues surrounding this approach. The purpose is to provide a focus for reflection and discussion of issues around potential contradictions between the use of web 2.0 technologies and traditional educational cultures and pedagogies in higher education (Lim, So, & Tan, 2010). As such, it focuses explicitly on issues of staff and institutional uptake and engagement, rather than on student engagement per se, with the intention of opening a discussion around the cultural change implicit in transitions from web 1.0 to web 2.0 technology supported pedagogy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, some researchers have highlighted the discrepancies between the learning practices implicit in Web 2.0 technologies and educational practices in current schooling (Lim et al, 2010). Different authors have agreed that Web 2.0 classes need to emphasise a learning culture based on participation, collaboration, inquiry, creativity, dialog and knowledge creation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%