Elderly women’s experiences of self-sampling for HPV testing

Abstract

Background: Self-sampling for HPV testing, as an alternative to the conventional speculum based sampling, is highly acceptable to women of screening ages. The aim of this study was to describe older women's (60 to 75 years) experiences of self-sampling. Methods: In Sweden a descriptive study with quantitative and qualitative methods was designed to collect data from a survey of women who participated in self-sampling for HPV testing. Individual interviews were done with women who tested positive in the first self-sampling, and were either negative in their second HPV test or were positive in their second HPV test, but without precancerous lesions or cancer. Results: Of 893 eligible women, 868 (97.2%) answered the survey. Among the surveyed women, 49.2% reported it was very easy to perform self-sampling, 46.8% answered it was easy and 2.0% answered it was not easy. A majority (58.9%) answered that they prefer self-sampling, 16.5% that they prefer sample collection by a healthcare provider, 23.7% did not have any preference and 0.9% did not answer the question. In the interviews, 13 of 16 invited women participated. Most of them reported that they prefer self-sampling because it was easy to perform, less embarrassing and less time consuming than a visit to a clinic. The majority of women reported that they were not worried when informed about having an HPV positive test. Overall, participating women with better knowledge about the significance of an HPV infection were more worried about having a positive HPV test. Conclusion: Cervical cancer remains a highly preventable disease through screening and early treatment. Our results indicated that vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing was a well-accepted method for cervical cancer prevention in this group of older women.

Acceptability of self-sampling human papillomavirus test for cervical cancer screening in Japan: A questionnaire survey in the ACCESS trial

“…Acceptability of the self-sampling HPV test was favorable. This result is consistent with many previous studies across various countries [ 7 , 22 – 28 ]. In contrast to the overall favorable acceptability of the test, concerns about the self-sampling procedures were recognized.…”

The future of cancer screening after COVID‐19 may be at home

“…Cancer Month 0, 2020 populations, reducing the embarrassment that often accompanies these tests in a medical office. [23][24][25][26][27] There are cost differences, however. Cologuard has a lower cost per screening than colonoscopy, but the screening intervals are more frequent, and therefore the overall cost per patient is higher.…”

“…Based on the evidence for mt‐sDNA testing and FIT, and the emerging findings regarding cervical self‐screening, home‐based patient screening is both accessible and acceptable to patients 18‐22 across diverse populations, reducing the embarrassment that often accompanies these tests in a medical office 23‐27 . There are cost differences, however.…”

Self-Sampling Devices for HPV Testing

“…In a study evaluating the experiences of self-testing at home in older participants (60 to 75 years of age) in Sweden, the majority of participants found self-sampling to be easy or very easy to perform and preferred self-sampling over clinician-collected sampling. 40 The authors found that participants who had more understanding about HPV infection and its relationship to cervical cancer were more concerned about receiving a positive HPV test result. 40 Other studies have found generational differences and report that self-sampling is generally more acceptable to younger individuals.…”

“…40 The authors found that participants who had more understanding about HPV infection and its relationship to cervical cancer were more concerned about receiving a positive HPV test result. 40 Other studies have found generational differences and report that self-sampling is generally more acceptable to younger individuals. 33,41 Medically Underserved Populations…”