2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95593-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elderly Care - Human Activity Recognition Using Radar with an Open Dataset and Hybrid Maps

Abstract: There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such vari-ant was used in reference [123] where the authors trained ResNet model to classify six activities and achieved 96% accuracy. In the similar way, GoogleNET has also shown its effectiveness to recognize six activities [146]. For the same dataset, ResNet with time-Doppler as input showed 85% accuracy [123] whereas GoogleNET with phase and amplitude of time-Doppler map as input showed 86% accuracy.…”
Section: Cnn Based Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such vari-ant was used in reference [123] where the authors trained ResNet model to classify six activities and achieved 96% accuracy. In the similar way, GoogleNET has also shown its effectiveness to recognize six activities [146]. For the same dataset, ResNet with time-Doppler as input showed 85% accuracy [123] whereas GoogleNET with phase and amplitude of time-Doppler map as input showed 86% accuracy.…”
Section: Cnn Based Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction from radar data can leverage the increasing dimensionality of radar signals (e.g., higher range resolution), frontends with multiple input and multiple output capabilities, increasing angular and spatial diversity, and on the various data representations ranging from raw IQ data directly sampled by the radar directly to range-time, range-Doppler, range-azimuth, angle-of-arrival, spectrograms, cadence velocity diagrams, cepstrograms, phase plots [46], [47], cyclostationarity signatures [48], radon transform signatures [49], and other composite views e.g., range-Doppler surfaces [30]. Thus, open research questions remain as to what format or combination of formats are most suitable for the classification process, perhaps exploiting forms of cognition that modify accordingly such processes depending on the specific activities to be classified.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used the open dataset Radar Signatures of Human Activities [35], which was recently used by Zhang et al [83] to produce hybrid maps and train the CNN architectures LeNet-5 and GoogLeNet for classification and benchmarking, respectively, using transfer learning. Jiang et al [54] used this dataset for RNN-based classification with an LSTM-based classifier, achieving an average testing accuracy of 93.9%.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%