2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elbow function after repair of the distal biceps brachii tendon with a two-incision approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4,9,11,12,16,24,26,30,32,34,37,40,41,43,44 One study found that peak supination torque occurred at 12 of forearm supination during isokinetic testing of a normal population, leading us to believe that the peak strength measurements in the literature might not be representative of the entire function of the repair. 16 Isokinetic testing does not typically involve comparisons of peak supination strength differences at different forearm positions, other than positions of maximum torque.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,9,11,12,16,24,26,30,32,34,37,40,41,43,44 One study found that peak supination torque occurred at 12 of forearm supination during isokinetic testing of a normal population, leading us to believe that the peak strength measurements in the literature might not be representative of the entire function of the repair. 16 Isokinetic testing does not typically involve comparisons of peak supination strength differences at different forearm positions, other than positions of maximum torque.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weinstein et al reported their results with the modified Boyd-Anderson technique, using suture anchors rather than bone tunnel fixation, in 32 patients, with mean follow-up of 42 months. 40 No statistically significant differences were noted in any range of motion measurements between the repaired and uninvolved arms (p Ͼ .05), and for each strength and endurance measurement the mean for the repaired arm was at least 95% of that for the uninvolved arm. They reported 2 transient lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve palsies, 1 wound hematoma, 1 re-tear after a fall, and no radioulnar synostoses.…”
Section: Surgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There is still great debate as to whether one or 2 incision techniques have an effect on the risk of neurological injury [10,12]. However, it is now widely reported that range of movement outcomes are equivalent whether undertaken by a modified Boyd-Anderson or a single anterior incision approach [17]. Grewal, et al [10] randomised control of the study, and in interpretation of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%