2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elasticity of single-crystal iron-bearing pyrope up to 20 GPa and 750 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(164 reference statements)
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ne was used as the pressure medium, while two ruby spheres were also loaded next to the sample and were used as the pressure gauge [ Mao et al , ]; pressure uncertainties (±1σ) were calculated using multiple measurements of the ruby fluorescence spectra before and after each BLS measurement. High‐pressure Brillouin measurements were conducted in the symmetric (platelet) scattering geometry using the JRS Fabry‐Perot interferometer equipped with an avalanche photodiode detector (Count‐10B Photo Counting Module with approximately 5 c/s from Laser Components, Inc.) and a Coherent Verdi V2 laser with a wavelength of 532 nm having a focused beam size of approximately 20 µm in diameter at the Mineral Physics Laboratory of the University of Texas at Austin [ Lu et al , ]. The symmetric geometry relates the measured frequency shifts to the acoustic velocities ( V P and V S ) without the need for knowing the refractive index [ Whitfield et al , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ne was used as the pressure medium, while two ruby spheres were also loaded next to the sample and were used as the pressure gauge [ Mao et al , ]; pressure uncertainties (±1σ) were calculated using multiple measurements of the ruby fluorescence spectra before and after each BLS measurement. High‐pressure Brillouin measurements were conducted in the symmetric (platelet) scattering geometry using the JRS Fabry‐Perot interferometer equipped with an avalanche photodiode detector (Count‐10B Photo Counting Module with approximately 5 c/s from Laser Components, Inc.) and a Coherent Verdi V2 laser with a wavelength of 532 nm having a focused beam size of approximately 20 µm in diameter at the Mineral Physics Laboratory of the University of Texas at Austin [ Lu et al , ]. The symmetric geometry relates the measured frequency shifts to the acoustic velocities ( V P and V S ) without the need for knowing the refractive index [ Whitfield et al , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our modeling, we have taken into account the phase relations as a function of depth as well as the partitioning of Fe between olivine polymorphs and between olivine and residual basaltic components at the phase equilibria using previous experimental and theoretical results (Akaogi et al, 1989;Angel et al, 1992;Irifune, 1987;Irifune and Isshiki, 1998;Irifune and Ringwood, 1987;Katsura and Ito, 1989;Pacalo and Gasparik, 1990;Stixrude and Lithgow-Bertelloni, 2005;Xu et al, 2008). After considering the variation in phases and compositions with depth, the velocity of pyrolite has been constructed using the elasticity of olivine in this study and elasticity of other mantle phases in previous studies (Table 1) (Chai et al, 1997;Finger and Ohashi, 1976;Isaak et al, 2010;Jackson et al, 2003Jackson et al, , 2007Jiang et al, 2004b;Lu et al, 2013;Sang and Bass, 2014;Bass, 2000, 2002;Sinogeikin et al, 1998Sinogeikin et al, , 2001Wang et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 1997;Zou et al, 2012). The computed velocity model for a pyrolitic composition is compared to literature seismic profiles (Fig.…”
Section: The Velocity Contrast At the 410-km Depthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To understand the consequences of Fp Fe 2+ spin transition and Fe partitioning on the seismic profiles of the Earth's lower mantle, we have also modeled the mass density (ρ) and bulk sound velocity (V Φ ) profiles of a representative pyrolitic lower mantle composition along an expected mantle geotherm [Brown and Shankland, 1981] (calculation details are shown in SI section 4.2 [Tange et al, 2012[Tange et al, , 2009Dubrovinsky et al, 2000;Lu et al, 2013;Murakami et al, 2012;Ricolleau et al, 2010;Shukla et al, 2015;van Westrenen et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2015;Wu and Wentzcovitch, 2014]) and compared them with the density and bulk velocity without the Fe 2+ spin transition in Fp (Figure 2b). Here the bulk sound velocity is defined as V Φ = (K S /ρ) 1/2 , where K S is the adiabatic bulk modulus and values are taken along the geotherm.…”
Section: 1002/2016jb013543mentioning
confidence: 99%